Hi,
> The aim of the 2019-03 proposal, as far as I understand it, is to grant the
> RIPE NCC the authority to make formal judgements about alleged abuse of
> network resources with the implicit intention that unless the party involved
> ends the alleged abuse, the RIPE NCC would enforce the jud
Hi Gert,
> Now, I do share the wish to "do something!!" against BGP hijacking.
>
> So, maybe a more workable way forward would be to change this into a BCP
> ("the RIPE anti-abuse community states with full backing from the RIPE
> community that BGP hijacking, as defined in , is considered
> unwa
Hi Ronald,
> Given what you've just said, I don't think that it would be accurate
> to say that I am an uneuqivocal supporter of the present -process-
> for adopting RIPE policy proposals. In fact, quite the contrary.
> My hope would be that if working group `X' endorses some policy which
> could
Hi,
> I understand perfectly the concerns of those colleagues who actually want to
> promote a better responsible behaviour and ensure the resources allocated to
> the LIR-s are not abused or there is an effective mechanism to stop abuse.
> However, as the chair kindly pointed, RIPE policy devel
Hi,
> We have published a transparency report that details the nature
> of the requests we received from Law Enforcement Agencies in 2019.
>
> You can find the report at:
> https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-740/
I see a small contradiction in there. At the beginning it is stated that "
Hi Randy,
>> Otherwise we change the way the working Groups works it will remain
>> unchanged for ever. I agree that we must get a way to vote or another
>> democratic way to get decisions.
>
> the goals of the ripe community are stewardship and cooperation, not
> voting, deciding, and "getting t
Hi Markus,
> Thank you Brian for the introduction and thank you all for supporting Brian's
> "out of cycle" proposal.
>
> My name is Markus de Brün and I am a computer scientist working for the
> Federal Office for Information Security in Germany (better known as BSI).
> BSI is home of the nati
Hi,
Amazing! Thanks to all involved ❤️
Cheers,
Sander
> On 3 Feb 2023, at 11:13, Brian Nisbet wrote:
>
> Colleagues,
>
> After much hard work by both the RIPE NCC Learning and Development Team and
> members of this Working Group, the Anti-Abuse training is now a reality! The
> training is
Hi,
> Brian is willing to accept his nomination. Tobias and I are happy to continue
> to work with him. It would be great to hear from you if you support Brian as
> well.
Definitely!
Sander
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your
subscription optio
Hi Ronald,
> It now seems certain to me that the absence of anything even remotely
> approximating proper validation of RIPE route objects is not, in fact,
> a problem which is limited to just inter-RiR situations. Apparently,
> RIPE member LIRs can just as easily hijack the IP blocks of other
>
Hi,
> Op 5 okt. 2015, om 15:34 heeft James Gannon het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Personally I find this email to be entirely non-sensical, your specific
> dealings with cloudflare or other vendors are in my opinion not relevant
> discourse, but instead of ccing the WG on these why not write u
Hi Ronald,
> Op 2 nov. 2015, om 07:38 heeft Ronald F. Guilmette
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> The claim clearly being asserted by the RIPE WHOIS record for AS204224
> is that this is an *IN-REGION* (Russian) company, one which, as I noted,
> is apparently a 16 year old parts & equipment suppli
Hi Roland,
>>> The issue isn't the announcement of out-of-region IP space. The issue
>>> is the self-evidently fradulent nature of the registration of, and the
>>> WHOIS record for, AS204224.
>>
>> Again that lousy "self-evidently" argument. Please don't use that, it is
>> often used by people w
Hi Roland,
> The old saying is "The best is the enemy of the good". Validation and/or
> verification of RIPE WHOIS data can be improved, even though any system
> which attempts to do so most probably cannot be made foolproof.
Ok
> No. You're still thinking in terms of constructing an iron-clad
Hi Sasha,
>> I would actually prefer any such proposal to come from within
>> the regular RIPE community, rather than from one of us
>> outsiders.
>
> For once I agree completely. If this goes to an actual proposal,
> this needs to be in APWG as it would be:
>
> a) address policy b) affecting th
Hi Denis,
Op 4 nov. 2015, om 18:17 heeft denis het volgende
geschreven:
> On 04/11/2015 15:32, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 12:05:28AM +, ripede...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>>> the sponsoring LIR should be restricted to an LIR in the same
>>> geographical/political/language a
Hi Ronald,
> On the one hand, you say that all these entities (both people and
> businesses) have consented to have RIPE NCC store and distribute
> their contact data. On the other hand you say that RIPE NCC has
> no knowledge of the terms and conditions of the contracts they have
> signed. Give
Hi Ronald,
> Anything that achieves that goal has my vote (_if_ I even have a vote).
There is no voting in RIPE policy development, which is based on consensus. And
everybody who wants to participate is part of forming consensus :)
Cheers,
Sander
Hi Tim,
>> STEP 3: continiously check if the block is allocated in the foreign RIR
>> database, if no longer, delete the route-object from RIPE's IRR db.
>
> We share concerns raised by Job. We believe this adds a lot of complexity to
> the implementation, and introduces an unacceptable risk of
Hello Denis,
> Sorry Elvis but you are neither a software engineer nor a regular user
> inputting data into the RIPE Database. So your unsubstantiated statement of
> 'poor' does not carry much weight.
Excuse me, but you do not get to decide that a fellow working group member's
contribution doe
Hi Ronald,
> Which LIR issued AS201133?
>
> Is this supposed to be some sort of a secret?
Not really, it is documented in the RIPE database. Here is how you can find it:
First search the database for the AS:
https://apps.db.ripe.net/search/query.html?searchtext=AS201133
There you see the AS wi
Hi Ronald,
> Lastly, I must ask the question: What is RIPE NCC, exactly?
This is a common question. I think this section on
https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe gives a good starting point:
> What's the difference between RIPE and the RIPE NCC?
>
> Although similar in name, the RIPE NCC and
Hi Sascha,
> Op 1 aug. 2017, om 18:19 heeft Sascha Luck [ml] het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> It certainly is "interesting". For instance:
>
> "we recently signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Europol to
> foster even better cooperation."
>
> https://www.ripe.net/publications/news/about-ri
Hi Jasper,
> Furthermore:
> Since you are stating in the rationale “If organisations are not cooperative,
> the RIPE NCC ultimately has the possibility to close their RIPE NCC
> membership and deregister their Internet number resources”. This ultimate
> possibility is not described in the curre
Hi,
> Op 14 mrt. 2018, om 15:22 heeft Name het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> This does not address black hole email addresses, nor does it validate that
> an email address is an abuse email address. I could put YOUR email address as
> my abuse contact. Because your email address is valid, it wou
25 matches
Mail list logo
