Re: [anti-abuse-wg] UCEPROTECT DNSBL possibly abusive practice and RIPEStat Blacklist entries widget

2021-03-03 Thread Christian Teuschel
t; http://www.uceprotect.org/cart00neys/index.html > <http://www.uceprotect.org/cart00neys/index.html>). >   > And the other type of threatening: http://www.uceprotect.org/ > <http://www.uceprotect.org/> >   > Does RIPE NCC have any position on this specific blacklist? > > Thank you! -- Christian Teuschel RIPE NCC | @christian_toysh

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] UCEPROTECT DNSBL possibly abusive practice and RIPEStat Blacklist entries widget

2021-03-04 Thread Christian Teuschel
t operators and their data or > none. Including only a couple will lead to the impression that only > those are important enough to be considered by the RIPE NCC. > > my 2 cents, > Elvis > > On 3/3/21 8:27 AM, Christian Teuschel wrote: >> Dear colleagues, >> >&g

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] UCEPROTECT DNSBL possibly abusive practice and RIPEStat Blacklist entries widget

2021-03-09 Thread Christian Teuschel
community. We can then take it from there. Let me know if this approach works for you. Best regards, Christian On 04/03/2021 17:16, Christian Teuschel wrote: > Hi Elvis and Suresh, dear colleagues, > > Putting exact numbers on how many operators are using UCEProtect is > difficult, but thro

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] UCEPROTECT DNSBL possibly abusive practice and RIPEStat Blacklist entries widget

2021-03-12 Thread Christian Teuschel
, Christian Teuschel wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > Thinking about a course of action - it looks there is an agreement to > have more RBLs on RIPEstat. It would be good to have a list of > candidates that the community feels would be useful. Once we have this > list, we can per

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] UCEPROTECT DNSBL possibly abusive practice and RIPEStat Blacklist entries widget

2021-03-19 Thread Christian Teuschel
sted in RIPEstat, we also post developments on Twitter under #RIPEstat. Best regards, Christian On 12/03/2021 09:51, Christian Teuschel wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > I can see a few suggestions for additional blocklists to include. It > would be helpful if we could get any others by

[anti-abuse-wg] Blocklists on RIPEstat (Was: UCEPROTECT DNSBL possibly abusive practice and RIPEStat Blacklist entries widget)

2021-07-08 Thread Christian Teuschel
#RIPEstat Best regards, Christian On 19/03/2021 14:24, Christian Teuschel wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > Thank you for your suggestions and input. Here is an update on what we > plan to do next: > > We will continue looking at blocklist candidates and prepare an > analysi

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Blocklists on RIPEstat (Was: UCEPROTECT DNSBL possibly abusive practice and RIPEStat Blacklist entries widget)

2022-05-18 Thread Christian Teuschel
tian On 08/07/2021 10:21, Christian Teuschel wrote: Dear colleagues, I would like to share a short update regarding the Blocklist project for RIPEstat. As you might have noticed, we changed the name to “blocklist” earlier this year in March. This month, we started evaluating new blocklists with

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Blocklists on RIPEstat (Was: UCEPROTECT DNSBL possibly abusive practice and RIPEStat Blacklist entries widget)

2022-05-18 Thread Christian Teuschel
Good evening, Will it be possible to show per country? Kind regards, Jeroen -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: anti-abuse-wg Namens Christian Teuschel Verzonden: woensdag 18 mei 2022 21:46 Aan: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net Onderwerp: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Blocklists on RIPEstat (Was: UCEPROTECT

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Non-Efficacious Use of UCEPROTECT RBL data in RIPEstat

2023-08-21 Thread Christian Teuschel
data call in the API documentation. However, that has been corrected now. If you have any more questions or ideas about this feature, please don't hesitate to reach out. Wishing you the best, Christian Teuschel RIPE NCC On 03/08/2023 17:06, Ping Technology Labs LTD wrote: Hello, I am