Re: [anti-abuse-wg] addtess verification (was: personal data in the RIPE Database)

denis wrote: > This defeats your own argument. You were arguing you need to know the > addresses of these natural persons so you can link separate resources > having the same address. Using the IDs of random people and drunks > from a bar will give them all different addresses. Knowing these > addr

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Adding a "Security Information" contact?

On 07-06-2022 12:42 +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 12:35:47PM +0200, denis walker wrote: > > You could add an optional attribute "security-mailbox:" alongside > > the > > "abuse-mailbox:". If present it could be returned in a query with > > the > > abuse-mailbox addre

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Adding a "Security Information" contact?

El mar, 07-06-2022 a las 13:14 +0200, Gert Doering escribió: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 11:02:19AM +0000, Ángel González Berdasco via > anti-abuse-wg wrote: > > I don't think the problem would be to add a new attribute if > needed. > > The problem would be

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Adding a "Security Information" contact?

Gert Doering writes: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 12:36:10PM +0000, Ángel González Berdasco via > anti-abuse-wg wrote: > > abuse-c: GROBECKER-ABUSE > > > > and the GROBECKER-ABUSE object: > > abuse-mailbox: gene...@abuse.grobecker.info > > abuse-m

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Adding a "Security Information" contact?

Cynthia Revström writes: > I think this sounds like a good idea as someone who is also very much > interested in security. > > > However I think the implementation details should be discussed in the > db-wg as opposed to the aa-wg. > > > -Cynthia It affects both anti-abuse and db-wg. If anti-a

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Adding a "Security Information" contact?

Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > "whois, as in 'this particular way users interface with the DB'" :-) > > (I'm aware it's the server doing this - which makes changing the > implementation easier, as it's "just one place" - but in the end, > "it needs to be done" which was the point I tried to make

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Autoresponders

On 2022-08-22 at 11:40 +0200, Alan Levin wrote: > On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 at 07:50, someone <…@ripe.net> wrote: > > I’m out of office till 22 August. Any RIPE Labs related queries can > > be sent to l...@ripe.net and one of my colleagues > > will get back to > >

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?

John Levine wrote: > It appears that U.Mutlu said: > > So, what to do if the hoster is uncooperative, like in this case? > > Where else to complain, what else to do? > > If their ASN info is to be believed, they're in Bulgaria. It's > unlikely anyone there cares. > > Just block their network 80

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?

U.Mutlu wrote: > Maybe there is a WHOIS or ASN error: > Trying the following gives a different company for the said IP: > > $ whois 80.94.94.254 > > % Abuse contact for '80.94.92.0 - 80.94.95.255' is 'ab...@bunea.eu' > > I now have filed the AR also to that new address. Asking for 80.94.94.x re