[anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations

2024-04-05 Thread Alessandro Vesely
Hi all, what's the policy for reverse delegation? My provider assigned me a 2a02:29e1:500:6c00::/56. Great. However they didn't delegate reverse DNS. Indeed, their own 2a02:29e1::/32 has no delegations: ; <<>> DiG 9.18.24-1-Debian <<>> 1.e.9.2.2.0.a.2.ip6.arpa ns ;; global options: +cmd ;;

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations

2024-04-05 Thread Michele Neylon - Blacknight via anti-abuse-wg
Have you asked them to setup PTR records? We usually do it for our clients, so I’ve no idea how others handle it -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations

2024-04-05 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Fri 05/Apr/2024 14:41:01 +0200 Michele Neylon - Blacknight via anti-abuse-wg wrote: Have you asked them to setup PTR records? I did so for IPv4. They're unable to delegate but can set PTRs. For IPv6, they don't have delegation for their own range, so cannot possibly resolve mine. We

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations

2024-04-05 Thread Michele Neylon - Blacknight via anti-abuse-wg
It depends on the LIR – some let you, some don’t. And no, you don’t own the IPs – the LIR does -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: htt

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations

2024-04-05 Thread John Levine
It appears that Alessandro Vesely said: >Why isn't it possible to gain a delegation by proving number assignment? Because your ISP can't be bothered. I have a free /48 from Hurricane and they delegated the rDNS as part of the setup so it's not like it's unusual or difficult. Delegating IPv6 rDNS