+1
Best
Peter
Am 24.03.24 um 01:52 schrieb Carlos Friaças via anti-abuse-wg:
Hi everyone,
My 2 cents:
I'm clearly for option 1.
Cheers,
Carlos
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Hi chairs, all,
I think this is a great working group. Periods of silence are
physiolog
Chairs,
Thanks for opening the discussion.
The fact the mailing list is currently relatively dormant is not necessarily a
bad thing thing(tm).
There is certainly value in keeping this working group, as one of the main
issues that will pop-up end of 2024/2025 will be the future revision of the D
I don't have an issue expanding the scope of the WG by e.g. rechartering
as security wg. This would be probably be useful.
In relation to lack of progress on WG policy items and repeated circular
discussions, most of the these centered on one of two things 1.
perceived lack of viability of som
Markus
There should be a simple “continue as now” option, though I do appreciate that
opening a discussion on the WG’s future could be useful
Expanding the group’s scope – okay, but to what? And to what end?
Regards
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domai
