Hi,
On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 11:20:51PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> Just a brief point. I previously noted here that RIPE's rules requiring
> unanimity or near unanimity in order to declare "consensus" with respect
> to any given proposal has recently been recognized, by some EU politician
Hi,
The RIPE NCC Service Region spans over 70+ economies.
In fact it spans over the whole planet when someone from outside the
service region details some plans to use IP addresses mostly within the
service region -- is this verified some time after the resources are
allocated?
So perhaps
So perhaps the first hurdle to change anything is understanding that
RIPE/RIPE NCC <> EU, despite the fact the RIPE NCC must abide by the laws
of ONE of EU's member countries.
I fixed that for you:
So perhaps the first hurdle to change anything is understanding that
RIPE/RIPE NCC <> EU, despite
Hi,
On Tue 07/Jun/2022 11:45:05 +0200 Max Grobecker wrote:
Our abuse mailbox is not overflowing with these, of course, but it makes
semi-automated handling a bit painful. For example, we would like to forward
these information to our customers, but we wont need to take further action
on this,
On Tue 07/Jun/2022 20:14:49 +0200 Ángel González Berdasco via anti-abuse-wg
wrote:
Gert Doering wrote:
"whois, as in 'this particular way users interface with the DB'" :-)
(I'm aware it's the server doing this - which makes changing the
implementation easier, as it's "just one place" - but i
In message ,
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Carlos_Fria=E7as?= wrote:
>The RIPE NCC Service Region spans over 70+ economies.
>
>In fact it spans over the whole planet when someone from outside the
>service region details some plans to use IP addresses mostly within the
>service region -- is this verified som
