Michele,
I have a question for u then.
What would happen if i can find more people that actually would want this
then u can find people that don't want this.
Would that make a difference?
I'm very curious on your answer.
Kind regards
Van: Michele Neylon - Blacknight
Verzon
No, because RIPE has no authority to fine anyone. If you think someone is
intentionally sending you malicious traffic, the police is the point of contact
for you.
—
Matthias Merkel
[https://cdn.staclar.com/logos/novecore/newlogo.png]
[Sent from Front]
On June 2, 2022, 3:27 PM GMT+2
jer...@hacke
That could be changed if u ask me by contractual changes Ripe has with it's
members.
But i kinda get the feeling people in this group don't want to make the
internet a better place!
Kind regards
Van: Matthias Merkel
Verzonden: donderdag 2 juni 2022 15:31
Aan: jer...@hackersbescherming
Jeroen
RIPE policy is not decided by a vote or astro-turfing.
Also what you are proposing is over simplistic and would be impossible to
operationalise without bankrupting the NCC.
What is "abusive traffic"?
Who decides what is or is not "abusive"?
Who is going to enforce this?
How?
Bear in
Ok, in a period of 6-7 weeks i gathered 6425 unique IP addresses that where
used in an abusive way on a single online service, excluding the 21 that
where found in the access log.
So i blocked 99,66% of the unwanted traffic fort his particular service
Think about;
- scanning for vulnarabilities
-
6,000 abusive IPs is quite few. I think most people on this list are aware
about abuse on the internet (this is what the group is about after all).
The question is not whether this usage is wrong, it's whether RIPE is the right
venue to enforce it. RIPE is only one of several RIRs, so this would
In message , Matthias Merkel wrote:
>... If you think someone is
>intentionally sending you malicious traffic, the police is the point of
>contact for you.
Yes, because in practice THAT works oh so well!
Worldwide, and even in Russia, the police just LOVE cleaning up the messes
that we in the n
In message <009401d8768b$4286eca0$c794c5e0$@hackersbescherming.nl>,
jer...@hackersbescherming.nl wrote:
>But again, i get the feeling this group hardly has any people in it from the
>public interest and is bassicly filled with internet cowboys who don't care
>about all the crap that is being push
Colleagues,
while we encourage any discussion on the list, please keep in mind that
we have a code of conduct [1]. Accusing individuals is neither helpful
nor acceptable. So please, keep the discussion matter-of-factly and
consider your language and phrasing.
Kind regards,
Markus
Co-Chair, R
