Hi there, (speaking as Tobias, and not a Chair)
I disagree with the idea of defining what abuse is for 3 reasons.
First, we will never be going to get it done. If you ask 200 people you'll
get 500 opinions. We already know that from RIPE, maawg, IETF, ICANN, and
every other organization in the hi
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 07:20:48PM +0100, Tobias Knecht via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
> I disagree with the idea of defining what abuse is for 3 reasons.
I do understand your arguments, but I'm not agreeing with the conclusion.
If we can't agree on "this is abuse" and "that is not", how can we ev
> On 23 Feb 2022, at 18:39, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 07:20:48PM +0100, Tobias Knecht via anti-abuse-wg
> wrote:
>> I disagree with the idea of defining what abuse is for 3 reasons.
>
> I do understand your arguments, but I'm not agreeing with the conclusion.
>
Hi,
On 23.02.22 20:00, Laura Atkins wrote:
On 23 Feb 2022, at 18:39, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 07:20:48PM +0100, Tobias Knecht via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
I disagree with the idea of defining what abuse is for 3 reasons.
I do understand your arguments, but I'm not ag
On 23/02/2022 20:39, Gert Doering wrote:
This takes me back 50+ years to US Supreme Court Justice Stewart's
definition of obscenity:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it
Regards,
Hank
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 07:20:48PM +0100, Tobias Knecht via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
I d
