On Mon 08/Apr/2024 12:19:15 +0200 Gert Doering wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 12:10:57PM +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Delegations don't seem to be generated from the database. How is that
supposed to work?
They are, but maybe not for the highest level.
Like, 8.0.6.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa - th
On Sun 07/Apr/2024 20:33:28 +0200 Gert Doering wrote:
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:44:45PM -0400, John Levine wrote:
If you care about rDNS, you need to find a better ISP that meets your
needs. Then tell the old one why you left.
That seems to be a problem in Italy these days - few ISPs offer I
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 12:10:57PM +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> Thanks, that apparently works. However, -T domain -d 2a02:: finds
> 0.0.0.0.2.0.a.2.ip6.arpa. It seems to prepend a variable number of zeroes
> and cite the wrong name servers (see queries below). Shouldn't it find
> 2.0.a.
On Sun 07/Apr/2024 16:47:37 +0200 Semisol via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
On 7.04.2024 15:42, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
BTW, how should one search DB objects like 2.0.a.2.ip6.arpa? I can search it
in the DNS but not in https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/query
-T domain -d
I believe you can also
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:44:45PM -0400, John Levine wrote:
> If you care about rDNS, you need to find a better ISP that meets your
> needs. Then tell the old one why you left.
That seems to be a problem in Italy these days - few ISPs offer IPv6
at all, so finding one that does IPv6 *and* r
It appears that Alessandro Vesely said:
>On Sat 06/Apr/2024 19:54:27 +0200 Randy Bush wrote:
> Why isn't it possible to gain a delegation by proving number
> assignment?
Because your ISP can't be bothered.
>>> Is such unbotherability legitimate?
>RIPE could at least reproach those L
On 7.04.2024 15:42, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
BTW, how should one search DB objects like 2.0.a.2.ip6.arpa? I can
search it in the DNS but not in https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/query
-T domain -d
I believe you can also use the more/less specific flags with that query
but I didn't try.
On Sat 06/Apr/2024 19:54:27 +0200 Randy Bush wrote:
Why isn't it possible to gain a delegation by proving number
assignment?
Because your ISP can't be bothered.
Is such unbotherability legitimate?
these years, it is one of the things when considering a provider from
which one gets address sp
>>> Why isn't it possible to gain a delegation by proving number
>>> assignment?
>> Because your ISP can't be bothered.
> Is such unbotherability legitimate?
these years, it is one of the things when considering a provider from
which one gets address space.
part of the problem is that this used n
On Sat 06/Apr/2024 17:23:27 +0200 Gert Doering wrote:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 11:52:45AM +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On Fri 05/Apr/2024 20:19:59 +0200 John Levine wrote:
It appears that Alessandro Vesely said:
Why isn't it possible to gain a delegation by proving number assignment?
Beca
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 11:52:45AM +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On Fri 05/Apr/2024 20:19:59 +0200 John Levine wrote:
> > It appears that Alessandro Vesely said:
> > > Why isn't it possible to gain a delegation by proving number assignment?
> >
> > Because your ISP can't be bothered.
>
On Fri 05/Apr/2024 20:19:59 +0200 John Levine wrote:
It appears that Alessandro Vesely said:
Why isn't it possible to gain a delegation by proving number assignment?
Because your ISP can't be bothered.
Is such unbotherability legitimate?
I appreciate the fact that my provider endowed me w
It appears that Alessandro Vesely said:
>Why isn't it possible to gain a delegation by proving number assignment?
Because your ISP can't be bothered.
I have a free /48 from Hurricane and they delegated the rDNS as part
of the setup so it's not like it's unusual or difficult. Delegating
IPv6 rDNS
not expect you
to respond to it outside of your usual working hours.
From: Alessandro Vesely
Date: Friday, 5 April 2024 at 16:24
To: Michele Neylon - Blacknight , anti-abuse-wg
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] Please use caution when opening attachments
utside of your usual working hours.
From: anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Alessandro Vesely
Date: Friday, 5 April 2024 at 13:01
To: anti-abuse-wg
Subject: [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] Please use caution when opening attachments from unrecognised
sources.
Hi all,
what's
ient for me. I do not expect you
to respond to it outside of your usual working hours.
From: anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Alessandro
Vesely
Date: Friday, 5 April 2024 at 13:01
To: anti-abuse-wg
Subject: [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] Please use caution when ope
Hi all,
what's the policy for reverse delegation? My provider assigned me a
2a02:29e1:500:6c00::/56. Great. However they didn't delegate reverse DNS.
Indeed, their own 2a02:29e1::/32 has no delegations:
; <<>> DiG 9.18.24-1-Debian <<>> 1.e.9.2.2.0.a.2.ip6.arpa ns
;; global options: +cmd
;;
17 matches
Mail list logo
