noarch
> ansible-collection-netbox-netbox.noarch
>
> and move as folks add them. You're welcome to install ansible-core and
> any collections you need from there or galaxy.
>
> Hope that helps some.
>
Yes, it does.
Thank you!
--
Mark Mielke
--
You received this message b
ceived bias, as
> long as you are willing to examine all the facts.
>
I looked the changes, and from my perspective - many trivial changes have
been introduced over the last year. I think "allow Ansible to remotely
manage Oracle Linux 8" is both a trivial change, and an imp
sm. I am asking for an
objective review. I am not trying to insult. Are there any other voices
from the Core team on this issue, particularly ones that do not work for
Red Hat? (And I also don't mean the Red Hat angle to be a slant... conflict
of interest is insidious, and it affects us all...
Hi all:
This Pull Request was closed due to "The 2.9 release is only accepting
security fixes at this time in its lifecycle. As such, this PR does not
meet the requirements to be backported to 2.9.":
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/76146
However, availability of releases beyond Ansible
If you ssh to the device and type "show version", what does it say? The
message seems self explanatory?
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019, 11:06 PM KESHAV YADAV What is the reason behind the below output ? The device is reachable and
> ssh is successful from MAC terminal.
>
>
> #ansible R2 -m raw -a "show ve
oded. Possible
implementation: gather_mounts=local,!network
4) I should disable the "hardware" facts entirely, and implement my own
facts for the checks I do require, such as seeing of /localdisk is mounted.
Leave Ansible alone. This might be the easiest fix for today, but it
disables
l means, such as the Ansible PPA for Ubuntu, or PyPI.
>
> If you have any questions, please reach out here.
>
> Jason McKerr
>
> Director of Engineering, Ansible Core.
>
> Ansible by Red Hat.
>
--
Mark Mielke
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
