I support the adoption without my chair hat. This is an useful work for
extending the voucher format.
However, with my chair hat on, I am a little bit concern regarding to whether
we have enough expertise to do this well within ANIMA WG. By the definition of
ANIMA, we are focusing on autonomic
> ANIMA is chartered to work on BRSKI extensions.
> This document just uses JOSE. It doesn't extend it in anyway.
> You don't need to know JOSE much, anymore than you have to know CMS or
> COSE (less).
> It also doesn't extend RFC8366, but all the experts on that document are in
> this WG.
[SJ] I
Hi, Brian,
I am fully support that there should be a mechanism to config GRASP in the
certain domain and also the flood methods. However, I have no clean the
definition of grasp-version and why. Are we going to have multiple GRASP
versions active in the same time? For my understanding, in an an
your reasons why.
Sheng JIANG is the assigned document shepherd.
Regards,
Sheng
___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
is one small change, a note
> >> about
> the maximum size of a GRASP objective.
> >>
> >> I believe this is ready for WG Last Call.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>Brian
> >>
> >> On 13-Sep-21 17:02, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrot
Russ, many thanks for your review and kindly replies. It is good for authors
and ANIMA WG.
Best regards,
Sheng
> -Original Message-
> From: Russ Housley via Datatracker
> Sent: Tuesday, November 2, 2021 2:51 AM
> To: iot-director...@ietf.org
> Cc: anima@ietf.org; draft-ietf-anima-const
Hi, all,
This is a checking email to the WG collect the opinion whether
draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-05. Following our WGLC on -04 version,
we asked the IoT directory review. Russ Housley provided it and the authors
have reported that they addressed the received comments. If anyone
Thanks, Michael. Hopefully, your good example would inspire more people to
serve the community.
Cheers,
Sheng
> -Original Message-
> From: Anima On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2021 4:02 AM
> To: anima@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Anima] [ANIMA] Shepherd for dr
Hi, all ANIMAer,
This message starts a two-week adoption call for
draft-richardson-anima-rfc8366bis, which we have traced a few discussion and
think the WG is interested in. The adoption call ends December 19th, 2021.
Title: A Voucher Artifact for Bootstrapping Protocols
Name: draft-ric
comments.
Regards,
Sheng
From: Anima On Behalf Of Sheng Jiang
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 2:57 PM
To: anima@ietf.org
Cc: anima-cha...@ietf.org; Toerless Eckert
Subject: [Anima] Call for adoption: draft-richardson-anima-rfc8366bis, ends
December 19th, 2021
Hi, all ANIMAer,
This message
Hi, all,
I am working on the document shepherd for
draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy. Here are the IPR question. The chairs
must have answers for a) in order to forward this work (authors shall reply to
chairs only). If any one happens to know b), he shall also let the chairs know.
Tha
Hi, all,
As the ANIMA co-chair, this email notify the change of my affiliation. I will
leave Huawei in a week time for a family member health reason. My IETF
participation would continuously remain as an individual. I will continue to
serve as the ANIMA co-chair.
My Huawei's email account will
ed
work also on the anima@ietf.org mailing list to encourage WG
members to read your work and comment!
More details about the IETF 113 can be found
at:https://www.ietf.org/how/meetings/113/
ANIMA WG Chairs, Toerless/Sheng
--
Sheng Jiang 蒋胜
___
Anima mai
emember to (re-)start discussing any non-WG adopted
work also on the anima@ietf.org mailing list to encourage WG
members to read your work and comment!
More details about the IETF 114 can be found
at:https://www.ietf.org/how/meetings/114/
<https://www.ietf.org/how/meetings/113/>
ANIMA WG Chairs,
still like to apply time slot, we may have
some after the priority to above drafts.
Regards,
--
Sheng Jiang
___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
ward to make update
presentations or their future update plan.
draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud-04
draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-00
If any individual drafts still liked to apply time slots, we may have some
after the priority to above drafts.
Regards,
Sheng Jiang
On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 at 22:28, Sheng J
-services-dns-autoconfig
& draft-eckert-anima-grasp-dnssd, 5 Minutes, Toerless Eckert
Sheng
On Sat, 16 Jul 2022 at 08:54, Sheng Jiang wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> Here are the updated the collected agenda items together with allocated
> times.
>
> The below are the applied agenda it
t
> Anima@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
>
--
Sheng Jiang
___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
I noticed that my display name was in Chinese, and find how to fixed it.
Hopefully, this email will be in English.
Cheers,
Sheng
--Reply to Message--
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 23:19 PM ttehttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima__
Hi, Esko,
It would depend on how tight our final agenda would be. If you get 15 mins as
you asked, you shall complete your presentation, including your demo, in 10
mins leaving 5 mins for potential discussion.
Sheng
-- Original --
From: "Esko Dijk"https://da
Hi, ANIMA chairs,
We are updating our draft-ietf-anima-network-service-auto-deployment. We would
like to apply a 10-mins time slot to present the changes.
Topic/Title: An Autonomic Mechanism for Resource-based Network Services Auto-
deployment
Name of Presenter(s): Yujing or Sheng
Length of t
Hi, ANIMAers,
The chairs have uploaded the ANIMA session minutes.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/115/materials/minutes-115-anima-00
If you have any comments or corrections, please contact the chairs.
Regards,
Sheng & Toerless___
Anima mai
2022. If you do not feel this
document should advance, please state your reasons why. Sheng Jiang is now the
document shepherd. Regards,Sheng___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
would
check it with them after the authors made an update version. Till it meet the
condition, the chairs would push it forward.
Regards,
Sheng
-- Original --
From: "Sheng JIANG"___
Anima mailing list
Anim
Rob，Brian，
I have a quick glance to this "Series Y.3000, Supplement 71, Use cases for
autonomous networks", although I don't understand their numbering. (FUTURE
NETWORKS Y.3000–Y.3499）
It focuses on "use cases" for autonomous networks. Their autonomous networks
seems be quite different from
eng
-- Original --
From: "Sheng JIANG"https://www.itu.int/ITU-T/recommendations/rec.aspx?id=15041&lang=en
The second step could be an FYI response listing our framework documents,
existing standards, and ongoing work. Only needs a page. From the list of
liaison mana
Dear ANIMAers,
This message starts the two-week (*) ANIMA Working Group Last Call to advance
draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-06, which specifies enhancements to BRSKI (RFC8995)
to facilitate bootstrapping in domains featuring no or only time limited
connectivity between a pledge and the domain regis
> Hi, please be aware that the YANG components of this will be moved to
> rfc8366bis. They are already in the rfc8366bis-05, but I don't yet feel
> that we have *WG* Consensus to do this.In general, I don't have preference
whether this document of rfc8366bis defines YANG components. The major
> collect all known requirements for vouchers in RFC8366bis hoping that
> we covered all to avoid increasing complexity during augmentation of the
voucher.
I do not prefer the "all-covered" model. As you stated, all has to be "known"
for now. What if another unknown requirement appeared？ Anoth
he authors
please submit an update version. Then, the document shepherd can move it
forward.
Regards,
--
Sheng Jiang
>Dear ANIMAers,
>
>This message starts the two-week (*) ANIMA Working Group Last Call to advance
>draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-06, which spe
Add the "result" label into the mail title in order to emphasis the right
purpose.
Regards,
--
Sheng Jiang
>During the WGLC period, this drafts has received no objections, but comments.
>Therefore, the chairs would draw on a passed conclusion . The WG discuss
aft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Autonomic Networking
>Integrated Model and Approach (ANIMA) WG of the IETF.
>
> Title : Information Distribution over GRASP
> Authors
There is a student working on the extension defined in Section 4. It is
extended based on Brian's GRASP implementation. We are working on the open
source policy of University yet. We may also work out a demonstration scenario
later.
Regards,
Sheng
>Has anyone implemented for any of the use
Hi, Michael,
I actually agree your observation on the supportiveness of use case section. We
were discussing to move use cases section into appendix. Overall, use cases
here are not necessary or as a MUST. What we should focus on is the validity of
technical requirements on Section 4. If yes, i
It is the texts of use case part needed to be enhanced. We will work on
it in next update, making the use cases (maybe reduced to one or two in the
main text, as you suggested) solid and mapping to our technical requirements
well.
Cheers,
--
Sheng Jiang
>
>She
Dear ANIMAers,
This message starts the two-week (*) ANIMA Working Group Last Call to advance
draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-04, which defines an enhancement of Bootstrapping
Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI, RFC 8995) that supports alternative
certificate enrollment protocols.
This document'
Hi, Animaers,
The chairs has updated a primary version of ANIMA agenda for IETF116, as below
link.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/116/materials/agenda-116-anima-00
It is still an objective for changing. If you have any questions, please do
contact the chairs.
Regards,
Sheng___
Hi, all,
We received no negative response to the WGLC on draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-04
during the two-week WGLC and we did receive good reviews through the WG
document stage (started from July 2020, as draft-ietf-anima-brski-async-enroll)
and WGLC period. Considering the past history of this wor
Forget the result label, again. Resend it with the right label in email title.
Regards,
--
Sheng Jiang
>Hi, all,
>
>We received no negative response to the WGLC on draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae-04
>during the two-week WGLC and we did receive good reviews th
d WG chair would like to move it forward.
Regards,
--
Sheng Jiang
___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
Dear subject draft authors and ANIMA WG:
I am working on the document shepherd for draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud-08. Here
are the IPR question. The chairs/document shephred must have answers for a) in
order to forward this work (authors may reply to chairs only). If any one
happens to know (b),
There is a reasonable good foundation for this document giving it is coalesced
from parts of several relevant WG documents. I will launch the adoption call
soon.
Sheng JIANG
>Dear Sheng,
>
>On behalf of the co-authors, i would hereby like to ask for adoption of
>draft-
whether this document is meaningful for our ANIMA WG
by the ending time 2024/2/23rd. The writing quality of this document is a late
consideration after WG adoption.
Regards,
Sheng JIANG
___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman
The slides have been prepared before IETF 118, but did not have time to present
in Prague.
Regards,
Sheng JIANG
>Dear ANIMA-WG
>
>We have just put in a request for a 1-hour slot to meet in Brisbane, IETF119.
>Given how we will likely not have all contributors locally,
interested to contribute or co-work on this is welcome to
contact me.
Regards,
Sheng
> -Original Message-
> From: Anima On Behalf Of Esko Dijk
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 7:14 PM
> To: Brian E Carpenter ; Sheng JIANG
> ; Anima WG
> Subject: Re: [Anima] Lightweight G
> 585 * 3 : priority
>
> 587 * 4 : cache
>
> 589 * 5 : computing
>
> 591 9. Acknowledgements
>
> 593 Valuable comments were received from Michael Richardson and Brian
> 594 Carpenter. Contributions to early versions of this document was
&g
Hi, Brian,
> How does GRASP interwork with the NETCONF/YANG approach to network
management?
> ... if ANIMA doesn't answer it soon, we will not see much progress.
I fully agree.
> It seems time for ANIMA to focus on that, as the current batch of
BRSKI-related
> work is getting mature.
This does
an example
if we take prefix availability as a type of network resource.
Cheers,
Sheng
> -Original Message-
> From: forwardingalgori...@ietf.org On
> Behalf Of 'Toerless Eckert'
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 12:05 AM
> To: Sheng JIANG
> Cc: draft-iet
effort before the WG was formed...
>
> Cheers
> Toerless
>
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Sheng
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: forwardingalgori...@ietf.org On
> > > Behalf Of 'Toerless Eckert'
> > > S
; Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 9:26 AM
> To: Sheng JIANG
> Cc: anima@ietf.org
> Subject: [Anima] Sheng: Early IANA review for
> draft-ietf-anima-brski-discovery-03 please
>
> Dear Sheng,
>
> (author hat on):
>
> It would be great if you (chair hat on) could ask for IAN
ification/stability: the SID range definitions are in rfc8366bis
since at
> least
>2022 and are stable.
>
> 4. Contact: Toerless Eckert (co-author)
> Sheng Jiang (WG chair)
>
> Thanks a lot!
> Toerless (for the authors)
___
Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org
> thanks,
> Amanda
>
> On Mon Jul 15 22:55:58 2024, mjethanand...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hi Amanda,
> >
> > Please find inlined the request from the chairs of ANIMA WG, for the
> > request of an early SID allocation, which I am approving. Let me know
> >
Hi, Brian & Signaling design team,
Thanks for your hard work and the latest design. It looks useful to quickly
classify or identify the ASA in the receiver side. However, may I proposed the
rename "GRASP port number" to be "ASA type number", or something else without
"port number"? The introduc
this design, but it
is a necessary discussion point regarding to the granularity of ASA.
Regards,
Sheng
>-Original Message-
>From: Liubing (Leo)
>Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 11:11 AM
>To: Sheng Jiang; Brian E Carpenter; Anima WG
>Subject: RE: [Anima] Proposed change to GR
;
>> | Userland | | Userland | | Userland |
>||
>> | ASA|| GRASP Lib|---IPC -- | GRASP daemon | --- |
>Kernel |
>> | _| ^ |__| |__|
>||
>>|
>>
>We need some "common point" to start with. When a node comes up and
>hasn't established any AN neighborship, it needs to know which port number
>to use.
>
>For the bootstrap case, intuitively, that ASA port number should be well
>known. However, that doesn't help with other ASAs.
>Maybe there shou
Hi, Brian & ANIMA signaling team,
As the ANIMA chair, I will do a thorough review. But I cannot promise any date
till June 24. I will try my best to be earlier. I guess Toerless will do a
review, too.
Looking at our ANIMA meeting minutes from IETF 95, "Michael Behringer and
Michael Richardson
Hi, ANIMA,
As we informed in IETF 95, a “Research and Standards for Self-Managing 5G
Networks” workshop will be hold with European Conference on Networks &
Communications (EuCNC 2016), Athens, Greece, June 27, 2016.
More information, http://www.eucnc.eu/?q=node/112
This would also help to rais
Hi, Brian & authors of GRASP,
Thanks so much for your hard work on GRASP. With my WG chair hat on, I have
done a thorough review. (Giving that my review went much slower than I thought.
I did not complete it. This email only contains most of concepts and
considerations, up to section 3.4 . I wi
Hi, Brian,
It looks good. Then, only one paragraph description could address this. Thanks,
Best regards,
Sheng
From: Brian E Carpenter [brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: 27 June 2016 4:34
To: Sheng Jiang; anima@ietf.org; draft-ietf-anima-grasp
Hi, all anima,
We have requested two sessions of 2 hour + 2 hour for the ANIMA WG meeting for
IETF-96 (Berlin, Germany) and are starting to collect agenda items for these
sessions. Same with previous IETF meetings, we do not reserve the second
session for non-charter work items. It says the cha
Hi, ANIMA all,
The chairs have uploaded a primary meeting agenda for our ANIMA WG sessions in
Berlin, Germany.
Monday, 18:00-20:00, Afternoon Session III, Potsdam II
Thursday, 16:20-18:20, Afternoon Session II, Potsdam III
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/agenda/agenda-96-anima
If there is
Hi, ANIMA,
While we are working on minutes, there is an abstract summary have been updated.
https://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/int/trac/wiki/IETF96
Regards,
Sheng
___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
Hi, all,
The minutes for the ANIMA sessions at IETF96 in Berlin can be found at:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-anima
Many thanks to Bing Liu for taking minutes.
Please send any corrections to the chairs.
Best regards,
Sheng + Toerless
_
6. If you do not feel this
document should advance, please state your reasons why.
Sheng Jiang is the assigned shepherd.
Regards,
Sheng & Toerless
___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
Hi, all anima,
We have requested two sessions of 2 hour + 2 hour for the ANIMA WG meeting for
IETF-97 (Seoul, Korea) and are starting to collect agenda items for these
sessions. Same with previous IETF meetings, we do not reserve the second
session for non-charter work items. It says the charte
needed, as shepherd, Sheng Jiang will finalize the shepherd
document and send the document on.
Best regards,
Toerless & Sheng
From: Sheng Jiang [mailto:jiangsh...@huawei.com]
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 1:49 PM
To: anima@ietf.org
Cc: anima-cha...@tools.ietf.org; Toerless Eckert
Subject: WGL
Hi, ANIMA,
Due to the new proceeding tools, we do not have agenda showed in
tools.ietf.org. Please use the below link to access the agenda. Also, the main
material page fails to show the material for our second session. Please use the
second URL to access all materials.
https://datatracker.iet
Hi, Michael R,
We have a full agenda for Friday session. Since you do not apply a time slot, I
don't think I have any spare time could allocate.
I am not sure how you want to have the content for this document. If you want
to integrate it into bootstrap document, it is simple straight forward.
Hi, Michael,
The information I got from netconf looks conflict. It seems Kent and you
thought Netconf did not want this work and it is not a right home for it. But,
Mehmet thought netconf was interested in this work and would like to have it in
netconf. Personally, I support this work and think
Hi, ANIMA,
While we are working on minutes, there is an abstract summary have been updated.
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/IETF97summary
Wednesday morning session, 90 minutes. 77 attendees in the room + 10 remote
participants in the room.
* Signaling design team presented document st
Hi, all,
The minutes for the ANIMA sessions at IETF97 in Seoul can be found at:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/minutes/minutes-97-anima-00
Many thanks to Bing Liu for taking minutes.
Please send any corrections to the chairs.
Best regards,
Sheng + Toerless
___
Hi, all,
This message starts a two-week adoption call for Voucher work, which is a
straight-forward definition of common voucher formats as needed in both ANIMA
and NETCONF WG. Although it was submitted to netconf WG originally, after
discussion with netconf chairs and corresponding ADs, we all
acquire consensus in ANIMA WG.
Thanks,
Sheng
From: Sheng Jiang
Sent: 14 December 2016 0:57
To: anima@ietf.org
Cc: Toerless Eckert; anima-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Call for adoption on draft-kwatsen-netconf-voucher-00
Hi, all,
This message starts a two-week
Hi, Brian,
Thanks for your contribution and arrangement. We did have prototype code, which
we will bring to the hackathon in Chicago for interoperation test. It is not
open source yet. So we could not open for public access.
Best regards,
Sheng
> -Original Message-
> From: Anima [mail
Hi, all anima,
We have requested two sessions of 2 hour + 1.5 hour for the ANIMA WG meeting
for IETF-98 (Chicago, USA) and are starting to collect agenda items for these
sessions. Please send your request for agenda by March 16th, Thursday.
Same with previous IETF meetings, we do not reserve th
Hi, ANIMA all,
The chairs have uploaded a primary meeting agenda for our ANIMA WG sessions in
Berlin, Germany.
Monday, 13:00-15:00, Zurich A, Afternoon session I
Friday, 9:00-11:00, Zurich A, Morning session I
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/98/agenda/anima/
If there is any question or re
My vote is also yes for the flag. Although GRASP and ACP is mainly IPv6 based,
the operator might like to manage IPv4 plane through it. The dual stack/network
would be existing for a long while.
Sheng
> -Original Message-
> From: Anima [mailto:anima-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Willia
Hi, authors of draft-ietf-anima-voucher,
I am doing a thorough review as the document shepherd with my ANIMA chair hat
on. Please address the below comments so that we could process this document
further. I cannot claim myself a security expert, so extra security expert
review is needed, either
Kent,
Thanks for taking care my review comments. The chairs will launch the WGLC soon.
Sheng
> -Original Message-
> From: Anima [mailto:anima-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kent Watsen
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 7:50 AM
> To: anima@ietf.org
> Cc: Benoit Claise
> Subject: Re: [Anima]
ments by June 23, 2017. If you do not feel this document
should advance, please state your reasons why.
Sheng JIANG is the assigned shepherd.
Regards,
Sheng & Toerless
___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
Hi, all anima,
We have requested two sessions of 2.5-hour for the ANIMA WG meeting for IETF-99
(Prague, Czech) and are starting to collect agenda items for the session.
Please send your request for agenda by June 29th, Thursday.
Giving that most of our chartered work items have been matured
Hi, authors of draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity,
I am doing a thorough review as the document shepherd with my ANIMA chair hat
on. Please address the below comments so that we could process this document
further.
First, I have issues for section 2.1.4, "IPv4 only NOC application devices". I
second WGLC is not needed, as shepherd, Sheng Jiang will finalize the shepherd
document and send the document on.
Best regards,
Toerless & Sheng
___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
ivity.xml
> >
> > Diff for change done in ACP (explaining ACP connect better):
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=https://raw.gith
> > ubusercontent.com/anima-wg/autonomic-control-plane/master/draft-ietf-a
> > nima-autonomic-control-pla
ilto:t...@cs.fau.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 12:21 PM
> To: Sheng Jiang
> Cc: Anima WG; anima-cha...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Anima] Review of draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-02
>
> Thanks a lot, Sheng!
>
> Integrated fixes for all comments (see inline
Thanks Brian and coauthors for their great and fruitful work. This would be the
first RFC from ANIMA WG.
Best regards,
Sheng
> -Original Message-
> From: Anima [mailto:anima-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 4:22 AM
> To: Anima WG
> Subject:
Hi, ANIMA all,
The chairs have uploaded a primary meeting agenda for our ANIMA WG sessions in
Prague, Czech.
Wednesday, 9:30-12:00, Congress Hall III, Morning session I
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/agenda/anima/
If there is any question or request on the agenda, please let t
this document.
Please send your comments by July 28, 2017. If you do not feel this document
should advance, please state your reasons why.
Sheng JIANG is the assigned document shepherd.
Regards,
Sheng & Toerless
___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.
Hi, Toerless, Brian & Jeferson,
Please see my replies in line with quotas from you.
Toerless> Other folks in the IETF clearly think that a service definition is
NOT intent, but
> intent can only be some yet unclear high level policy. If thats the prevailing
> opinion/wisdom in the IETF, then IMH
Hi, all,
While the ANIMA minutes is still on the way, the co-chairs do provide a
abstracted summary of ANIMA session in IETF99. It can be find using the below
link:
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/IETF99summary#ANIMA
Regards,
Sheng
___
Anima mai
Hi, all
We received no negative response to the WGLC on
draft-ietf-anima-stable-connectivity-03 during the two-week WGLC and we did
receive good reviews through the WG document stage, through the shepherd review
process and WGLC period. Considering the past history of this work, I, with my
ANI
Track. At present, there is no IPR file
against this document.
Please send your comments by August 08, 2017. If you do not feel this document
should advance, please state your reasons why.
Sheng JIANG (ANIMA co-chair) is the assigned shepherd.
Regards,
Sheng (another ANIMA co-chair, Toerless, w
Hi, all,
The minutes for the ANIMA sessions at IETF99 in Prague can be found at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials/minutes-99-anima
Many thanks to Bing Liu for taking minutes.
Please send any corrections to the chairs.
Best regards,
Sheng + Toerless
_
Hi, authors of draft-ietf-anima-auotnomic-data-plane,
I am doing a thorough review as the document shepherd with my ANIMA chair hat
on. Please address the below comments so that we could process this document
further. This is a petty long document. Therefore, my review may be a little
bit dis
Somehow, I don't know how, I misspelled the name of the draft. Resend my review
comments with the right name in title and to the right authors alias.
Sheng
From: Anima [mailto:anima-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sheng Jiang
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 7:01 PM
To: anima@ietf.org
Cc:
Hi, Toerless,
Thanks for your hard and fruitful work. Giving the change mount from -03
version, which is the base for the first WGLC, I feel another WGLC is needed. I
will launch a short one-week WGLC on this. Meanwhile, I still not receive IPR
disclosure from all authors. I would not be able t
mber 27, 2017. If you do not feel this
document should advance, please state your reasons why.
Sheng JIANG is the assigned document shepherd.
Regards,
Sheng
___
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
Hi, all ANIMA,
As we are sending more documents to IESG for publication, the group has
delivered most of our original milestones without boiling the ocean. We are now
in a little bit more confidence to explore slightly wider area of autonomic
networking. We are now calling new works/work propos
Hi, all anima,
We have requested one session of 2.5-hour for the ANIMA WG meeting for IETF-100
(Singapore) and are starting to collect agenda items for the session. Please
send your request for agenda by Oct 27th, Thursday.
Giving that most of our chartered work items have been sent to IESG
1 - 100 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
