individually as building blocks for further work
in network automation, even when full autonomous behavior is not possible or
desirable.
Regards,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Toerless Eckert
> Sent: 01 July 2021 19:44
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; benoit.cla...@huawei.com
System ; Max Pritikin (pritikin)
> ; tte+i...@cs.fau.de; michael.h.behrin...@gmail.com;
> kent+i...@watsen.net; war...@kumari.net; Rob Wilton (rwilton)
> ; jiangsh...@huawei.com; t...@cs.fau.de;
> anima@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (6716)
>
>
&g
Great. Thanks Sandy.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Sandy Ginoza
Sent: 20 October 2021 15:26
To: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Cc: Michael Richardson ; RFC Editor
; Max Pritikin (pritikin) ;
anima@ietf.org; jiangsh...@huawei.com; Warren Kumari ;
tte+i...@cs.fau.de; michael.h.behrin
Hi Authors, ANIMA, Toerless,
My AD review of draft-ietf-anima-asa-guidelines-03 is inline. I have also
attached a copy of my review because the IETF mailer likes to truncate my
review emails, so please check that you reached my signature for the full
review.
Toerless, please can you also upda
ween configuration changes delivered
via NETCONF and configuration changes made by the ASA.
Further comments inline ... but none are actionable.
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian E Carpenter
> Sent: 24 November 2021 02:56
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; anima@ietf.org; draft
Hi Brian,
Holding it for the last call comments is fine. I've just kicked off the last
call request.
Regards,
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Brian E Carpenter
Sent: 29 November 2021 20:04
To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; anima@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-anima-asa-guidelines@iet
Hi,
This is my AD review for draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-06.
Thanks for this document. I found it pleasant to read and only had minor
comments.
1.
Abstract:
This intermediary node is known as a
"constrained Join Proxy". An enrolled Pledge can act as a Join
Proxy.
Is
off
an IETF LC.
Regards,
Rob
From: Peter van der Stok
Sent: 25 March 2022 08:54
To: anima@ietf.org
Cc: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Subject: Re: [Anima] I-D Action: draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy-07.txt
Hi WG,
A new version of constrained-join-proxy is submitted that includes the results
Approved.
Sorry for the delay (now back from PTO).
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Toerless Eckert
> Sent: 31 March 2022 18:37
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
> Cc: ops-...@ietf.org; Warren Kumari ; Anima WG
> ; anima-cha...@ietf.org
> Subject: Rob pls. approve:
Hi Peter, authors,
Sorry for the delay in this document, but I wanted to check that Juergen’s
concerns have been addressed, and I’m not sure if I ever saw a final reply from
him to confirm, and with that in mind I have lightly rereviewed some of the
document based on his comments.
My gist from
push it back to the next
telechat (probably in 3 weeks time).
Thanks,
Rob
From: Peter van der Stok
Sent: 07 June 2022 14:43
To: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Cc: last-c...@ietf.org; ops-...@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy@ietf.org; anima@ietf.org; Jürgen
Schönwälder
Subject: Re
have more certainty on what needs to change.
Thanks,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Toerless Eckert
> Sent: 09 June 2022 16:05
> To: Peter van der Stok
> Cc: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; last-c...@ietf.org; ops-
> d...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-anima-constrained-join-proxy...
wonder whether stateful alone wouldn’t be
sufficient. But it is also worth factoring in Juergen’s concerns as to whether
one of these two approaches better minimizes the security risk to the network.
Thanks,
Rob
From: Peter van der Stok
Sent: 13 June 2022 10:18
To: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Cc
Hi Anima WG,
Please see a liaison received from ITU-T related to "Architecture Framework for
Autonomous Networks". No reply to ITU-T is necessarily required, I'm
forwarding for your interest. The WG could decide to send a reply to highlight
the work occurring in ANIMA if you thought that woul
rm resolution is) if that is
helpful.
Thanks,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Esko Dijk
> Sent: 12 December 2022 17:33
> To: Michael Richardson
> Cc: RFC Errata System ; Max Pritikin (pritikin)
> ; tte+i...@cs.fau.de; michael.h.behrin...@gmail.com;
> kent+i...@
r RFC 7030.
It should say:
objective-value = text ; name of the supported protocol,
; e.g., "EST-TLS" for RFC 7030.
Regards,
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Michael Richardson
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2023 8:16 AM
To: Rob Wilton (rwil
...@kumari.net; Rob Wilton (rwilton)
; t...@cs.fau.de; shengji...@bupt.edu.cn; anima@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Anima] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8995 (7263)
Hi!
I do have a PTO today and will not be able to dial in ;-)
Best regards
Rufus
From: Esko Dijk
To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) , Buschart, Rufus
, Michael Richardson
Cc: RFC Errata System , Max Pritikin (pritikin)
, tte+i...@cs.fau.de ,
michael.h.behrin...@gmail.com ,
kent+i...@watsen.net , war...@kumari.net
, t...@cs.fau.de , shengji...@bupt.edu.cn
, anima@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Anima
2021 12:16 AM
> To: Toerless Eckert
> Cc: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; anima@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: MichaelR/Rob/*: RFC8995 errata concerns
>
>
> Toerless Eckert wrote:
> >> The other bit is that Registrars MUST IGNORE SNI when accepting Pledge
> >> conn
Hi,
Here is my AD review of draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud-08.
I confess that I’m not an expert on BRSKI and EST which has limited my ability
to do a technical review, but which may be the reason that I found that
document to be somewhat harder to understand.
Anyway, I have the following comment
Hi Anima chairs & authors of draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis,
I wanted to check the WG status of this document.
draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher-09 has been put on the publication requested queue
but seems to have a fairly strong dependency on draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis,
and hence I am wondering whet
Eckert
Date: Wednesday, 31 January 2024 at 04:12
To: Michael Richardson
Cc: anima@ietf.org , Brian E Carpenter
, Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Subject: Errata 6642: Re: [Anima] Registrar to MASA connections: SNI required
Michael, *:
You asked in another thread for verificiation of errata 6642:
https
Please hold off doing a poll until there are further details from the IESG on
the plans for virtual meeting support.
Regards,
Rob [wearing the incoming AD Hat]
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Richardson
> Sent: 11 March 2020 14:38
> To: Toerless Eckert
> Cc: anima@ietf.org; anima
Hi,
The use of LLDP in draft-richardson-anima-ipv6-lldp was raised on the IEEE-IETF
coordination alias.
Paul Congdon (Chair of IEEE 802.1 Maintenance Task Group, and very familiar
with LLDP) has reviewed and provided comments as an individual.
His opinion is that this would be a serious misuse
y 2020 05:15
> To: Toerless Eckert
> Cc: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; war...@kumari.net;
> anima@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Sheng: Pls. request AD approval for IANA early allocation of
> code points for draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane
>
> Hi, Toerless, Rob and Warren,
>
&
Hi,
Apologies for the delay for this review.
Please see comments below. I've also attached them in case they get truncated
(which has happened on other reviews).
Thank you for this document. Overall, it is very well written, easy to read
and easy to understand.
Comments:
1. Introduc
Hi Brian,
Thanks for the comments, please see replies inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian E Carpenter
> Sent: 30 September 2020 23:28
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; draft-ietf-anima-grasp-
> a...@ietf.org
> Cc: anima@ietf.org; Sheng Jiang
> Subject: Re: AD
Thanks for the work on this document and being responsive to my comments.
Apologies again for the delay in my AD review.
I've kicked off the IETF LC.
Regards,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Anima On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
> Sent: 14 October 2020 04:05
> To: anima@ietf.org
> Su
2 October 2020 18:19
> To: IETF Announcement List
> Cc: iot...@ietf.org; war...@kumari.net; Rob Wilton (rwilton)
>
> Subject: New Non-WG Mailing List: IOTOPS -- IOT Operations
>
> A new IETF non-working group email list has been created.
>
> List address:
o: Anima WG ; Rob Wilton (rwilton)
> Subject: [Anima] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-anima-grasp-
> api-10.txt
>
> This version closes the two minor issues and is IMHO ready for the RFC
> Editor.
>
> Regards
> Brian
>
> Forwarded Message -
his errata
tomorrow unless I hear any objections.
Thanks,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian E Carpenter
> Sent: 04 June 2021 23:29
> To: RFC Errata System ; jiangsh...@huawei.com;
> duzongp...@chinamobile.com; sunqi...@chinatelecom.cn;
> war...@kumari.net; Rob Wilton
Hi Kent, Michael,
Re:
> Is it proper to reset a NETCONF publication for another WG? Rob?
No, but if there are simple/quick changes that we can make to the NETCONF draft
to make it more reusable then I think that is a good thing.
In this case, I think that this should come down to the discretio
Hi Michael,
> -Original Message-
> From: Anima On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
> Sent: 25 June 2021 21:41
> To: Toerless Eckert ; Fries, Steffen
> ; anima@ietf.org; net...@ietf.org; Kent
> Watsen ; Rob Wilton (rwilton)
> Subject: [Anima] revising RFC8366 -- Re
33 matches
Mail list logo
