Esko Dijk wrote:
> For cBRSKI I've created a new PR:
> https://github.com/anima-wg/constrained-voucher/pull/325
I reviewed.
> 1. We want the equivalent of certificate chains as carried in CMS
> signing envelope on the unconstrained network path 2. We don't want
> these l
Esko Dijk wrote:
> Agree with the change from "URI" to "Path Segment".
So where do we do this cleanup?
Can it occur in cBRSKI?
--
Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_