Approved.
Discussed the allocations with the authors, and the next rev. of the document
will have a more consistent way to find the definitions of these new
registrations.
The registrations themselves are fine.
Wrt to email communications:
1. Sorry for the delay, the email ended up in the wrong
Hi all,
Another item to consider for 8366bis: the option to carry vendor-specific
fields like configuration data in the Voucher.
Created a Github issue for this: https://github.com/anima-wg/voucher/issues/74
We can discuss this idea further in the Tuesday design team call today (or a
next one)
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-18.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach (ANIMA) WG
of the IETF.
Title: BRSKI with Pledge in Responder Mode (BRSKI-PRM)
Authors: Steffen Fries
Thomas Werner
Eliot L
Dear all,
We just updated BRSKI-PRM to address review comments from SECDIR, GenART and
DNSDIR as well as the IANA Expert review:
- addressed nits received from the GenART review
- addressed comment from IANA to update contact for service name registration
from IESG to IETF Chair in Section 10.2
