Wow nice! I haven't tried JNI before as well and I could not imagine it
would be interesting for such small functions.
In my case though I will stick to Calendar use as the time spent for time
formating is now little enough compared to the remaining parts. Si I won't
gain significant in further op
Thanks for the update!
I just sat down and put together a JNI routine that uses strftime in C and I
took my formatting from 50%+ of the routine that was populating my view down
to 0.2%. I would call that a significant improvement! Here is the code I
used:
Java Class
public class JN
I do confirm using Date is about 2x faster.
But I tryed using Calendar as Date.getHours/Minutes etc. is deprecated. The
good news is that is even faster: Almost 6x faster than my original which
was using DateFormat.format
Here is my code:
private static Calendar sTmpCalendar = Calendar.get
No I don't. Time as been converted from string to timemilli on a serveur for
efficiency, and I have to convert them back to String when I want to display
it.
2011/10/14 Zsolt Vasvari
> Sure, if you don't care about localization issues.
>
> On Oct 14, 5:26 am, Thierry Legras wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
Thanks Steven! I will try that.
As Date.getHours() etc. methods are mentioned as deprecated. I will check
with Calendar class as well if it is still faster than DateFormat.
Thierry.
2011/10/14 Studio LFP
> It is slow and so is String.format(). I've been messing around with it a
> bit and here
5 matches
Mail list logo
