I also have a small number of users who fail the LVL test (< 1%). My
solution is to have my app call my website first to ask if it should do the
LVL test. That way, if a user contacts me that it is not working I can set
it up so that his device no longer performs the check. I actually
implem
To bring this back on topic, has anyone who has experience with LVL, in a
NON in-app purchase way, just felt it was a waste of time and stopped using
it? I am starting to feel this way as one of the most frequent emails I
get regarding support is that the LVL check failed when they just purchas
TreKing, then joke around with what is fun then. I have got enough with bullies
which think that only those with English as first language are allowed to
comment. No, it has not been you, therefore the surprise and anger. Thought you
was better than those. Take it as you will...
--
You receive
And I on that it was the best-of-the-best-of-the-best that get hired by Google,
not the best-of-the-best.
And more seriously that you shouldn't dwell so much on it. If you really want
to work there try again. They might have a position that they think suits you
better. Or just drop it. Showing
Dude, no body is forcing you to read it, much less so to respond.
I commented on the best-of-the-best statement.
On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 4:54:55 AM UTC+8, Lew wrote:
>
> Zsolt Vasvari wrote:
>
>> No idea why you decided to write what you did, as it contributes nothing
>> to the topic.
>>
>>
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Jxn wrote:
> And English is not my first language, so I know I need someone to read and
> check my texts when it's important. Didn't know that spelling was so
> important here at the Android list. But thanks for informing me that if
> you don't have English as y
Den måndagen den 29:e oktober 2012 kl. 20:59:05 UTC+1 skrev TreKing:
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Jxn >wrote:
>
>> You shouldn't as you apparently got to an interview. Shouldn't be to bad
>> on a resume.
>
>
> Actually, getting an interview and not getting the job probably does look
> ba
Zsolt Vasvari wrote:
> No idea why you decided to write what you did, as it contributes nothing
> to the topic.
>
> Get a life, dude.
>
>>
>>
Hopefully it will contribute to your keeping your ego-aggrandizing,
bitter rants off this list.
--
Lew
--
You received this message because you are
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Jxn wrote:
> You shouldn't as you apparently got to an interview. Shouldn't be to bad
> on a resume.
Actually, getting an interview and not getting the job probably does look
bad on a resume. Actually, why would that even go on your resume...?
Also bad on a res
Neither did your post. And yes, you sounded bitter. You shouldn't as you
apparently got to an interview. Shouldn't be to bad on a resume.
And by the way, you was only the best of the best. Google hire the best of the
best of the best. See previous posts. ;-)
But this is OT.
--
You received th
No idea why you decided to write what you did, as it contributes nothing to
the topic.
Get a life, dude.
On Monday, October 29, 2012 1:07:08 AM UTC+8, Lew wrote:
>
> Zsolt Vasvari wrote:
>
>> Google hires the best of the
>>> best of the best, but they're only human too.
>>>
>>
>> I couldn't d
2012/10/28 Lew :
> Zsolt Vasvari wrote:
>> for, even though, when it comes to the Android Market, and generally
>> running a business, a little bit of common sense would go further than the
>> knowing the complexity of algorithm X.
>
>
> Yeah, you know so much better than their board does how to ru
Zsolt Vasvari wrote:
> Google hires the best of the
>> best of the best, but they're only human too.
>>
>
> I couldn't disagree more. I consider myself the best of the best when it
> comes to efficiency, common sense and business acumen, but they didn't hire
> me even after a long interview p
>
> Google hires the best of the
> best of the best, but they're only human too.
>
I couldn't disagree more. I consider myself the best of the best when it
comes to efficiency, common sense and business acumen, but they didn't hire
me even after a long interview process. I am not trying to
2012/10/28 Silvio Marano :
> Have you get any answer by Google Support?...
I don't remember if I reported this issue to support -- I just think
it's useless. Personal opinion, you don't have to be so pessimistic
(or realistic?) as I am.
I have tried many times to
> report this problem without suc
Have you get any answer by Google Support?... I have tried many times to
report this problem without success, and the staff give me only standard
answer without read my messages and the LVL server doesn't respond to app
checking and gives only timeouts
Il giorno martedì 8 maggio 2012 13:31:40
ok fine thankyou
Il try this and let you know the result
On Monday, September 17, 2012 10:20:12 AM UTC+5:30, Vinay Kumar wrote:
>
> Yes.
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:08 AM, janvi
> > wrote:
>
>> Ok thank you for this
>>
>> Is this licensing option which I have to enable is provided as a field
Yes.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:08 AM, janvi wrote:
> Ok thank you for this
>
> Is this licensing option which I have to enable is provided as a field in
> the uploading form?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
>
>
> On Sunday, September 16, 2012 10:42:17 PM UTC+5:30, Vinay Kumar wrote:
>
>> While uploadi
Ok thank you for this
Is this licensing option which I have to enable is provided as a field in
the uploading form?
Thanks in advance
On Sunday, September 16, 2012 10:42:17 PM UTC+5:30, Vinay Kumar wrote:
>
> While uploading your app on market(google play). you have to enable the
> Licensing
While uploading your app on market(google play). you have to enable the
Licensing option.there you probably you need to enter your(tester) gmail
id. That will be your tester credentials.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 9:35 PM, janvi wrote:
> I need the following information
>
> What are actually testin
I need the following information
What are actually testing credentials?
Is it enough to add a test account(gmail account of tester) in the option
provided in the edit profile page of google publisher account?
Still iam i missing any thing ?or this is the only step needed for this?
On Sunday,
Thanks for this
I will try this i,e il upload the app and try to test it and will require
your help if something goes wrong
Plz help me out here
Thanks in advance
On Saturday, September 15, 2012 10:06:44 PM UTC+5:30, Ichsan wrote:
>
> If you read the documentation, it is clear that you need
Ok fine thanks for this
I will try this i,e il upload the app and try to test it and will require
your help if something goes wrong
Plz help me out here
Thanks in advance
On Sunday, September 16, 2012 7:41:49 PM UTC+5:30, Vinay Kumar wrote:
>
>
> yes, we need to upload the app without publishin
yes, we need to upload the app without publishing it. For testing it we
need tester credentials too.
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Ichsan wrote:
> If you read the documentation, it is clear that you need to upload the app
> without publishing it.
>
> --
> You received this message because yo
If you read the documentation, it is clear that you need to upload the app
without publishing it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
Yes the above is the same example which is provided in android SDK
I have just added main activity which is called once the license is
verified properly
Any idea why iam facing the following errors
1.error contacting licensing server android
2.ERROR_NOT_MARKET_MANAGED
Iam testing it by using a
Have you tried Library which was provided with Android sdk?
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 2:57 PM, vinay kumar wrote:
> Have you tried which was provided with Android sdk?
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 2:50 PM, janvi wrote:
>
>> Any body who has already tried this help me out plz
>> Its very urgent
>
Have you tried which was provided with Android sdk?
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 2:50 PM, janvi wrote:
> Any body who has already tried this help me out plz
> Its very urgent
>
>
>
> On Friday, September 14, 2012 5:32:02 PM UTC+5:30, janvi wrote:
>>
>> Dear All
>>
>> I need a favour,though it is old
LVL is insufficient, no matter how much you modify it. Additional custom
anti-tamper code is required to make the job of crackers a bit more
difficult.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to a
2012/5/21 andrew android
>
> let's keep up the pressure on Google to fix it.
>
Huh?
Actually, good luck :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsub
21.05.2012 12:49, Michael A. написал:
Any app that is popular enough is going to find its way to pirate
sites pretty soon, and the LVL is (unfortunately) completely
inadequate to prevent that. So why risk the goodwill of the people who
have actually purchased the app, but adding in code tha
Not specifically a NOT_LICENSED response, but I recently had two users
where the LVL check was consistently, repeatedly timing out.
My LVL code is basically stock, based on next-to-last LVL version.
Based on logcat traces (both users were kind enough to provide these),
my code was able to requ
32 matches
Mail list logo
