bob wrote:
> Yes, malloc and free are oldies but goodies.
>
Uhhh ...
> I remember meeting malloc back in like 1991. It didn't want to give me
more than 64k back then, but it is nicer to me now.
Fond reminiscence doth not a sound engineering basis make.
I find the suggestion to switch to nati
Yes, malloc and free are oldies but goodies.
I remember meeting malloc back in like 1991. It didn't want to give me
more than 64k back then, but it is nicer to me now.
On Wednesday, November 14, 2012 1:07:00 PM UTC-6, Lew wrote:
>
> bob wrote:
>
>> Maybe you can use native code and use ma
bob wrote:
> Maybe you can use native code and use malloc and free?
>
Really?
--
Lew
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this gro
Maybe you can use native code and use malloc and free?
On Saturday, November 10, 2012 11:58:01 AM UTC-6, elihan wrote:
>
> I have an app with large heap set, running on a galaxy S3 GT-I9300, with
> android version 4.1.1
> The app needs to allocate a lot of temporary objects intermittently.
>
4 matches
Mail list logo