Re: [android-developers] Re: Check for internet connection inside an anonymous class

2009-12-30 Thread Mark Murphy
Hekki wrote: > Simple was a shortcut for "Should be a really easy task to achieve by > developers on a platform designed around the 'always connected' idea". > And the four lines of code you need to do it are easy enough, I admit, > but i can still not see why I need to have a context to ask the OS

[android-developers] Re: Check for internet connection inside an anonymous class

2009-12-30 Thread Hekki
> Reuse is a design consideration, but only *a* design consideration. > Possible Context leaks are another design consideration. If you will ! My idea behind this is that when released into the wild open source, a component like that has to be as independent as possible, plug-and-play. I've had to

Re: [android-developers] Re: Check for internet connection inside an anonymous class

2009-12-30 Thread Mark Murphy
Hekki wrote: > Since I'm not sure I fully understand that Context leak thing, I just > try to avoid it alltogether : > http://www.curious-creature.org/2008/12/18/avoid-memory-leaks-on-android/ Just be careful where and how you hold onto a Context. > But to the point : > I'm trying to make my code

[android-developers] Re: Check for internet connection inside an anonymous class

2009-12-30 Thread Hekki
> Hekki wrote: > > Since i'm in an anonymous class and I've read that it's not a good > > idea to pass the whole context to classes > > Where did you read that? I sure hope that I did not write that... Thanks for your answer. Since I'm not sure I fully understand that Context leak thing, I just t