On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 1:42:52 PM UTC-7, b0b wrote:
>
>
> They state "Top Developer is a badge recognizing established, respected
>> developers for their commitment to launching high-quality and innovative
>> apps on Android."
>>
>>
> That's clearly a statement that non-top developers
> They state "Top Developer is a badge recognizing established, respected
> developers for their commitment to launching high-quality and innovative
> apps on Android."
>
>
That's clearly a statement that non-top developers are "unestablished ,
unrespected and not committing developers with po
you need to befriend them harder :-) like, befriend the fuck out of them
:-P meeting the right people can get you things (we got the dev reply
option like a year in advance and even a free ticket to Google I/O)
I think it's more of a thing where they use it to get publicity to
themselves... if
On Monday, September 9, 2013 7:44:44 AM UTC-7, John Coryat wrote:
>
> >> i think you're best route is to befriend a google advocate and ask for
> the badge :)
>
> I did that and was told since we only have one major application, we were
> ineligible for consideration.
>
I tried that since our
On Monday, September 9, 2013 8:14:19 AM UTC-7, TreKing wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:44 AM, John Coryat wrote:
>
>> >> i think you're best route is to befriend a google advocate and ask for
>> the badge :)
>>
>> I did that and was told since we only have one major application, we were
>> i think you're best route is to befriend a google advocate and ask for
the badge :)
I did that and was told since we only have one major application, we were
ineligible for consideration.
-John Coryat
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android De
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:44 AM, John Coryat wrote:
> >> i think you're best route is to befriend a google advocate and ask for
> the badge :)
>
> I did that and was told since we only have one major application, we were
> ineligible for consideration.
>
Ask them how the fuck Uber is a top develo
I think there was already a discussion about this before (or that i've read
it on some other place)... the conclusion was "we have no fucking idea".
there were "top developers" with barely any app submissions or high count
of downloads.
i think you're best route is to befriend a google advocate
On Saturday, September 7, 2013 8:36:49 AM UTC-7, mbanzon wrote:
>
> I am going to take the fun side of your question and add a little serious
> perspective ;-)
>
> For some great advice and guidelines I would recommend you watch this:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxNDmOlODL8
>
>
Thanks, tha
On Saturday, September 7, 2013 8:30:20 AM UTC-7, John Coryat wrote:
>
> I believe the criteria involves having more than one popular application
> with a sufficiently high average rating. What "popular" and "sufficiently
> high" mean are subject to interpretation.
>
> -John Coryat
>
That's a g
I am going to take the fun side of your question and add a little serious
perspective ;-)
For some great advice and guidelines I would recommend you watch this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxNDmOlODL8
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 5:30 PM, John Coryat wrote:
> I believe the criteria involves havin
I believe the criteria involves having more than one popular application
with a sufficiently high average rating. What "popular" and "sufficiently
high" mean are subject to interpretation.
-John Coryat
On Friday, September 6, 2013 6:46:10 PM UTC-5, Nathan wrote:
>
> On my list of goals for the
12 matches
Mail list logo
