And in case you didn't know this: Calling someone "clueless" is rude. You
may as well call them "stupid". I don't reward rude behavior, so you just
shrank your pool of available talent by one.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" grou
Wow. Need some ESR up in here.
http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
I can see that you are keeping up your trolling effort. Again, how do you
explain a question that remained unanswered on StackOverflow for years? You
can not. While I do not expect people to be at my beck and call, you
insufferable troll, I do expect no one to know what the code means and how
t
@Marina
Thank you for that information. I had never encountered that problem
before. If I encounter it in the future I will know how to start figuring
out the root cause of the problem.
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 2:21 PM Justin Anderson
wrote:
> *"Everyone works within time constraints. Do not assu
*"Everyone works within time constraints. Do not assume that I have
unlimited time to wait."*
That is true, but no one made that assumption. Flip that around and you
can't assume that people on this forum are here at your beck and call.
*"I have already done my due diligence."*
Great. But that doe
Everyone works within time constraints. Do not assume that I have unlimited
time to wait.
I have already done my due diligence. As it is, there were no helpful links
and no one here helped, and you can get off your high horse because you did
nothing but derail the damn thread.
Your link is pat
*"For the millionth time, before I posted the question, I have already
tried searching for the answer, and all I found was an unanswered
StackOverflow question."*
I've already addressed that. That just adds to the reason that you should
be patient and wait a little longer. It also does nothing to
For the millionth time, before I posted the question, I have already tried
searching for the answer, and all I found was an unanswered StackOverflow
question. Do not try to make it sound like I expect anyone to do my work
for me, and no one here did anything worth a damn for me.
You people can
Sorry if you don't like the truth, but you were being rude and impatient.
When you post in this forum is it expected that somebody who knows the
answer will enlighten you, not that people will search for the solution for
you. It is also expected that if you should happen to solve the problem
yours
Glad you found the solution to your problem. :-)
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:57 AM Ristar wrote:
> If no one can answer, the normal assumption would be everyone's clueless.
> In any case, I did not assert that everyone's clueless, only asking if that
> were so. As it is, I have pointed out that th
If no one can answer, the normal assumption would be everyone's clueless.
In any case, I did not assert that everyone's clueless, only asking if that
were so. As it is, I have pointed out that the exact same question on Stack
Overflow remains unanswered, and he wasnt rude.
I am no longer intere
*"If you are such a fragile and sensitive being, I suggest that you stop
reading."*
I am neither fragile nor sensitive. You were being rude, were called out on
it, and then got belligerent. I was simply giving you some advice if you
really wanted to have a chance at getting an answer.
*"In fact, I
If you are such a fragile and sensitive being, I suggest that you stop
reading. In fact, I would go one step further and suggest that you stop
surfing the web in case it offends your delicate sensibilities. I do not
appreciate your derailing of the thread.
As I have mentioned earlier the same q
Rudeness is not defined by the question asked, but by how it was asked. And
yes, your second post was rude.
This list is answered by people who answer things in their spare time. They
aren't sitting around getting paid by Google (or anyone for that matter) to
answer questions.
It is not uncommon
On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 at 5:42:16 AM UTC+8, Lew wrote:
>
> Not with rudeness like that, we can't. Yeesh.
>
> On Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:19:02 AM UTC-7, Ristar wrote:
>>
>> Can anyone answer how to fix this? Like, come on, I already showed you
>> the error code. Or is everyone clueless?
>>
Not with rudeness like that, we can't. Yeesh.
On Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:19:02 AM UTC-7, Ristar wrote:
>
> Can anyone answer how to fix this? Like, come on, I already showed you the
> error code. Or is everyone clueless?
>
> On Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 3:32:12 PM UTC+8, Ristar wrote:
>>
>> Err
Can anyone answer how to fix this? Like, come on, I already showed you the
error code. Or is everyone clueless?
On Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 3:32:12 PM UTC+8, Ristar wrote:
>
> Error:Execution failed for task ':app:dexDebug'.
> > com.android.ide.common.process.ProcessException:
> org.gradle.proce
17 matches
Mail list logo
