Re: [PATCH 00/51] treewide: Switch to __pm_runtime_put_autosuspend()

2024-10-08 Thread Ulf Hansson
On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 at 00:25, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Ulf, > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 12:08:24AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 at 20:49, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 04:38:36PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > > &

Re: [PATCH 00/51] treewide: Switch to __pm_runtime_put_autosuspend()

2024-10-08 Thread Ulf Hansson
On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 at 20:49, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Ulf, > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 04:38:36PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 at 11:41, Sakari Ailus > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > This

Re: [PATCH 00/51] treewide: Switch to __pm_runtime_put_autosuspend()

2024-10-09 Thread Ulf Hansson
On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 at 20:25, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 12:35 AM Ulf Hansson wrote: > > > > On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 at 00:25, Laurent Pinchart > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Ulf, > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 12:

Re: [PATCH 00/51] treewide: Switch to __pm_runtime_put_autosuspend()

2024-10-07 Thread Ulf Hansson
On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 at 11:41, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > This set will switch the users of pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() to > __pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() while the former will soon be re-purposed > to include a call to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). The two are almost > always used