On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Edward O'Callaghan
wrote:
> The kfd_lookup_process_by_pasid() is just for that purpose,
> so use it instead of repeating the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c | 58
> +---
> 1
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Edward O'Callaghan
wrote:
> When the loop predicating timeout parameter passed happens to
> not be a multiple of 20 the unsigned integer will overflow and
> the loop will become unbounded.
>
> Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/a
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Edward O'Callaghan
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan
Please give a little explanation why this new function is needed.
In addition, I don't think "radeonkfd/amdkfd: .." is good as we never
used this kind of title before.
Let's just use "drm/amdkfd: ..."
Clean up the codes to move the release handles into fail labels.
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ucode.c | 21 ++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ucode.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amd
On 2016年09月12日 10:16, Huang Rui wrote:
Clean up the codes to move the release handles into fail labels.
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ucode.c | 21 ++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff -
