Am 19.09.2017 um 03:05 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
Thanks for the reviews. I rebased this on amd-staging-drm-next, retested
and submitted.
Christian, do you want to do some graphics PASID and VMFault work on top
of that? I think I'll be working on more KFD upstreaming this week and
maybe look at thi
Thanks for the reviews. I rebased this on amd-staging-drm-next, retested
and submitted.
Christian, do you want to do some graphics PASID and VMFault work on top
of that? I think I'll be working on more KFD upstreaming this week and
maybe look at this subject again next week.
Regards,
Felix
On
On 2017-09-12 01:48 AM, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> +John,
>
> If Alex is fine with it then I'm fine with it as well, as long as this
> is a temporary solution until some point where you have some
> convergence between your internal code and the upstream one.
Agreed. I want to converge those branches as
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Deucher, Alexander
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kuehling, Felix
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 5:54 PM
>> To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Deucher, Alexander; Oded Gabbay;
>> Koenig, Christian
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kuehling, Felix
> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 5:54 PM
> To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Deucher, Alexander; Oded Gabbay;
> Koenig, Christian
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Retry page fault handling for Vega10
>
> I realized th
I realized that the drm-next-4.15-wip branch isn't very useful for
testing this, because it has no display support for Vega10 and no KFD
support for Vega10. So you can't test graphics or compute on Vega10 with
this branch. On the other hand, I need to make changes in both KFD and
AMDGPU, so I tried
