On Mon, Oct 2, 2017, at 08:22, Kuehling, Felix wrote:
> Is the "new debug trap handler" already working? It seems right now I'm
> breaking the "old" debugger backend test. However, given the current
> status of that debugger, I guess we can disable those tests for now?
>
> Can you speak on behalf
special event IDs anymore.
Thanks
Hari
-Original Message-
From: Jay Cornwall [mailto:j...@jcornwall.com]
Sent: Monday, October 2, 2017 10:05 AM
To: Kuehling, Felix ; Thangirala, Hari
; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Oded Gabbay
Subject: Re: KFD event handling questions
On Mon, Oct 2,
should I consult someone else
on their end as well?
Regards,
Felix
-Original Message-
From: Thangirala, Hari
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 8:44 PM
To: Kuehling, Felix; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Oded Gabbay
Subject: RE: KFD event handling questions
Hi Felix,
Event IDs reserve
bugger. 4096 is good enough and
> the new debug trap handler will use events from that pool.
>
> Thanks
> Hari
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kuehling, Felix
> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:36 PM
> To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Oded Gabbay
that pool.
Thanks
Hari
-Original Message-
From: Kuehling, Felix
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:36 PM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Oded Gabbay ;
Thangirala, Hari
Subject: KFD event handling questions
[Hari, can you comment on the last paragraph below regarding the events
[Hari, can you comment on the last paragraph below regarding the events
limit? Would it hurt the runtime much to lose 8 signals out of 4096?]
Hi Oded,
I'm looking into upstreaming some event handling enhancements. I see
that you actually worked on increasing the number of events to 4096 and
worki
