.@vger.kernel.org
Cc: opensource.ker...@vivo.com,Bernard Zhao
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] amdgpu: remove unnecessary condition check>Am 21.04.20
um 10:03 schrieb Bernard Zhao:
>> There is no need to if check again, maybe we could merge
>> into the above else branch.
>>
>> Sign
>> But i have to say there are so many code not follow the kernel code-style in
>> amdgpu module.
>> And also the ./scripts/checkpatch.pl did not throw any warning or error.
>
> That is unfortunately true, yes. But we try to push new code through the
> usual code review and improve things as we g
>>> There is no need to if check again, maybe we could merge
>>> into the above else branch.
I find also this commit message still improvable (besides the mentioned
implementation details around coding style concerns).
How will corresponding review comments be taken better into account?
Regards,
> But i have to say there are so many code not follow the kernel code-style in
> amdgpu module.
> And also the ./scripts/checkpatch.pl did not throw any warning or error.
Will such information become more interesting for further evolution
in the affected software areas?
Regards,
Markus
_
There is no need to if check again, maybe we could merge
into the above else branch.
Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao
Changes since V1:
*commit message improve
*code style refactoring
Changes since V2:
*code style adjust
Link for V1:
*https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1226587/
---
.../gpu/dr
Am 21.04.20 um 10:44 schrieb 赵军奎:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
index 9dff792c9290..5424bd921a7b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
Am 21.04.20 um 10:03 schrieb Bernard Zhao:
There is no need to if check again, maybe we could merge
into the above else branch.
Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao
Changes since V1:
*commit message improve
*code style refactoring
Changes since V2:
*code style adjust
Link for V1:
*https://nam11.safel
