This looks all good to me, do you need someone to push this to drm-misc?
On Mon, 2025-03-24 at 13:51 +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Existing DPCD access functions return an error code or the number of
> bytes being read / write in case of partial access. However a lot of
> drivers either (incorr
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 13:51:18 +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Existing DPCD access functions return an error code or the number of
> bytes being read / write in case of partial access. However a lot of
> drivers either (incorrectly) ignore partial access or mishandle error
> codes. In other cases t
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 03:34:02PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> This looks all good to me, do you need someone to push this to drm-misc?
No, I can do that. I have resent it in order to retrigger Intel and Xe
CI builds. It seems that Xe built was successful and i915 shows
unrelated issues. I think it
Existing DPCD access functions return an error code or the number of
bytes being read / write in case of partial access. However a lot of
drivers either (incorrectly) ignore partial access or mishandle error
codes. In other cases this results in a boilerplate code which compares
returned value with
