@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] validate/clean the functions of ip funcs
On 10/18/2024 7:08 PM, Christian König wrote:
Patches #2, #3 and #12 are Acked-by: Christian König
The rest are Reviewed-by: Christian König
Maybe give others till Monday to take a look as well, could be that
Alex
ect: Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] validate/clean the functions of ip funcs
>
>
> On 10/18/2024 7:08 PM, Christian König wrote:
> > Patches #2, #3 and #12 are Acked-by: Christian König
> >
> >
> > The rest are Reviewed-by: Christian König
> >
> > Maybe give other
On 10/18/2024 7:08 PM, Christian König wrote:
Patches #2, #3 and #12 are Acked-by: Christian König
The rest are Reviewed-by: Christian König
Maybe give others till Monday to take a look as well, could be that
Alex, Lijo or somebody else point out that we are ignoring the suspend
return c
Patches #2, #3 and #12 are Acked-by: Christian König
The rest are Reviewed-by: Christian König
Maybe give others till Monday to take a look as well, could be that
Alex, Lijo or somebody else point out that we are ignoring the suspend
return code during XGMI hive reset for a good reason.
I
v6: Fixed the missing return statement on suspend and update the code
with V5 comments.
v5: Fixed review comments. Dropped hw_fini patch and need to look
further why such functions exists. hw_init/hw_fini are mandatory
functions and we should have a valid definition.
v4: hw_init/hw_fi
