Re: [PATCH v1 02/12] drm/gma500: Make I2C terminology more inclusive

2024-05-02 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Am 30.04.24 um 19:38 schrieb Easwar Hariharan: I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave" with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, n

[PATCH v1 02/12] drm/gma500: Make I2C terminology more inclusive

2024-05-01 Thread Easwar Hariharan
I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave" with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that the approved verbiage exists in the specific