On 4/5/2024 9:15 AM, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> Hi Easwar,
>
> On 3/29/24 18:00, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
>> series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the term
On Fri, 2024-04-05 at 09:30 -0700, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review, and for the appetite to go further! So we are
> on the same page, you would prefer
> renaming to controller/target like the feedback on other drm drivers
> (i915, gma500, radeon)?
FWIW I'm in support of this as
Hi Easwar,
On 3/29/24 18:00, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of
I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now
I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of
I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that the approved verbiage exists
in the specification.
