Am 08.11.2017 um 18:37 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 08/11/17 05:41 PM, Christian König wrote:
Am 08.11.2017 um 17:36 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 08/11/17 03:59 PM, Christian König wrote:
Instead of having a pointless wrapper or call the underlying ww_mutex
function directly.
Not sure I can agree i
On 08/11/17 05:41 PM, Christian König wrote:
> Am 08.11.2017 um 17:36 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
>> On 08/11/17 03:59 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>> Instead of having a pointless wrapper or call the underlying ww_mutex
>>> function directly.
>> Not sure I can agree it's pointless, since it recently too
Am 08.11.2017 um 17:36 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 08/11/17 03:59 PM, Christian König wrote:
Instead of having a pointless wrapper or call the underlying ww_mutex
function directly.
Not sure I can agree it's pointless, since it recently took me a while
to realize that unlocking bo->resv is essent
On 08/11/17 03:59 PM, Christian König wrote:
> Instead of having a pointless wrapper or call the underlying ww_mutex
> function directly.
Not sure I can agree it's pointless, since it recently took me a while
to realize that unlocking bo->resv is essentially the same as
unreserving the BO.
Anywa
Instead of having a pointless wrapper or call the underlying ww_mutex
function directly.
Signed-off-by: Christian König
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 13 +++--
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_execbuf_util.c | 8
include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h| 14 +-
