Am 13.09.2018 um 00:58 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
Is the small reduction in memory footprint (8 bytes per page table on a
64-bit kernel) really worth the trouble of open-coding a single-linked
list implementation?
Well the key point is it is now a power of two again. So we don't waste
28KB per pa
Is the small reduction in memory footprint (8 bytes per page table on a
64-bit kernel) really worth the trouble of open-coding a single-linked
list implementation? I guess this change makes a bigger difference for
2-level page tables than it does for 4-level, because the amdgpu_vm_pt
array is alloc
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou
On 2018年09月12日 16:55, Christian König wrote:
Instead of the double linked list. Gets the size of amdgpu_vm_pt down to
64 bytes again.
We could even reduce it down to 32 bytes, but that would require some
rather extreme hacks.
Signed-off-by: Christian König
---
d
Instead of the double linked list. Gets the size of amdgpu_vm_pt down to
64 bytes again.
We could even reduce it down to 32 bytes, but that would require some
rather extreme hacks.
Signed-off-by: Christian König
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/
