Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: Process fences on IH overflow

2024-01-15 Thread Christian König
Am 15.01.24 um 12:19 schrieb Friedrich Vock: On 15.01.24 11:26, Christian König wrote: Am 14.01.24 um 14:00 schrieb Friedrich Vock: If the IH ring buffer overflows, it's possible that fence signal events were lost. Check each ring for progress to prevent job timeouts/GPU hangs due to the fences

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: Process fences on IH overflow

2024-01-15 Thread Friedrich Vock
On 15.01.24 11:26, Christian König wrote: Am 14.01.24 um 14:00 schrieb Friedrich Vock: If the IH ring buffer overflows, it's possible that fence signal events were lost. Check each ring for progress to prevent job timeouts/GPU hangs due to the fences staying unsignaled despite the work being don

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: Process fences on IH overflow

2024-01-15 Thread Christian König
Am 14.01.24 um 14:00 schrieb Friedrich Vock: If the IH ring buffer overflows, it's possible that fence signal events were lost. Check each ring for progress to prevent job timeouts/GPU hangs due to the fences staying unsignaled despite the work being done. That's completely unnecessary and in s

[PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: Process fences on IH overflow

2024-01-14 Thread Friedrich Vock
If the IH ring buffer overflows, it's possible that fence signal events were lost. Check each ring for progress to prevent job timeouts/GPU hangs due to the fences staying unsignaled despite the work being done. Cc: Joshua Ashton Cc: Alex Deucher Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Friedr