).
BR
Evan
From: amd-gfx On Behalf Of Deucher,
Alexander
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 10:16 PM
To: Das, Nirmoy ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Koenig,
Christian
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/amd/pm: drop unnecessary feature->mutex lock
protections(V2)
[AMD Official Use Only - Inter
, Nirmoy ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/amd/pm: drop unnecessary feature->mutex lock
protections(V2)
The explanation sounds sane, but since I don't know the affected code at
all the series is only Acked-by: Christian König
Maybe wait for Alex to give you an r
The explanation sounds sane, but since I don't know the affected code at
all the series is only Acked-by: Christian König
Maybe wait for Alex to give you an rb if you are unsure, otherwise feel
free to commit.
Christian.
Am 27.08.20 um 08:39 schrieb Nirmoy:
Series is Acked-by: Nirmoy Das
Series is Acked-by: Nirmoy Das
On 8/25/20 9:49 AM, Evan Quan wrote:
As these operations are performed in hardware setup and there
is actually no race conditions during this period considering:
1. the hardware setup is serial and cannnot be in parallel
2. all other operations can be performed o
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
Ping..
-Original Message-
From: Quan, Evan
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 3:49 PM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Deucher, Alexander ; Quan, Evan
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] drm/amd/pm: drop unnecessary feature->mutex l
As these operations are performed in hardware setup and there
is actually no race conditions during this period considering:
1. the hardware setup is serial and cannnot be in parallel
2. all other operations can be performed only after hardware
setup complete.
V2: rich the commit log descriptio
