On 11/13/2024 11:27 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 11:59 PM Lazar, Lijo wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/13/2024 1:58 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>> smu->workload_mask is IP specific and should not be messed with in
>>> the common code. The mask bits vary across SMU versions.
>>>
>>> Mo
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 11:59 PM Lazar, Lijo wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/13/2024 1:58 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > smu->workload_mask is IP specific and should not be messed with in
> > the common code. The mask bits vary across SMU versions.
> >
> > Move all handling of smu->workload_mask in to the backe
On 11/13/2024 1:58 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> smu->workload_mask is IP specific and should not be messed with in
> the common code. The mask bits vary across SMU versions.
>
> Move all handling of smu->workload_mask in to the backends and
> simplify the code. Store the user's preference in smu-
smu->workload_mask is IP specific and should not be messed with in
the common code. The mask bits vary across SMU versions.
Move all handling of smu->workload_mask in to the backends and
simplify the code. Store the user's preference in smu->power_profile_mode
which will be reflected in sysfs. F