On 2018-02-27 11:44 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 2018-02-27 05:16 PM, Harry Wentland wrote:
>> On 2018-02-27 11:08 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On 2018-02-27 04:54 PM, Leo Li wrote:
On 2018-02-27 05:34 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 2018-02-26 09:15 PM, Harry Wentland wrote:
>> From: "
On 2018-02-27 05:16 PM, Harry Wentland wrote:
> On 2018-02-27 11:08 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 2018-02-27 04:54 PM, Leo Li wrote:
>>> On 2018-02-27 05:34 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 2018-02-26 09:15 PM, Harry Wentland wrote:
> From: "Leo (Sunpeng) Li"
>
> Non-legacy LUT size s
On 2018-02-27 11:08 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 2018-02-27 04:54 PM, Leo Li wrote:
>> On 2018-02-27 05:34 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On 2018-02-26 09:15 PM, Harry Wentland wrote:
From: "Leo (Sunpeng) Li"
Non-legacy LUT size should reflect hw capability. Change size from 256
On 2018-02-27 04:54 PM, Leo Li wrote:
> On 2018-02-27 05:34 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 2018-02-26 09:15 PM, Harry Wentland wrote:
>>> From: "Leo (Sunpeng) Li"
>>>
>>> Non-legacy LUT size should reflect hw capability. Change size from 256
>>> to 4096.
>>>
>>> However, X doesn't seem to play wit
On 2018-02-27 05:34 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 2018-02-26 09:15 PM, Harry Wentland wrote:
From: "Leo (Sunpeng) Li"
Non-legacy LUT size should reflect hw capability. Change size from 256
to 4096.
However, X doesn't seem to play with legacy LUTs of such size.
Therefore, check for legacy lut
On 2018-02-26 09:15 PM, Harry Wentland wrote:
> From: "Leo (Sunpeng) Li"
>
> Non-legacy LUT size should reflect hw capability. Change size from 256
> to 4096.
>
> However, X doesn't seem to play with legacy LUTs of such size.
> Therefore, check for legacy lut when updating DC states, and update
From: "Leo (Sunpeng) Li"
Non-legacy LUT size should reflect hw capability. Change size from 256
to 4096.
However, X doesn't seem to play with legacy LUTs of such size.
Therefore, check for legacy lut when updating DC states, and update
accordingly.
v2: Use a macro for the maximum drm LUT value.