Re: [PATCH 0/1] On DRM -> stable process

2024-11-08 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 11:41:18AM +0300, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: > On Tue, 05. Nov 07:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 05:55:28PM +0300, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: > > > It is just strange that the (exact same) change made by the commits is > > > duplicated by backporting tools.

Re: [PATCH 0/1] On DRM -> stable process

2024-11-08 Thread Fedor Pchelkin
On Tue, 05. Nov 07:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 05:55:28PM +0300, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: > > It is just strange that the (exact same) change made by the commits is > > duplicated by backporting tools. As it is not the first case where DRM > > patches are involved per Greg'

Re: [PATCH 0/1] On DRM -> stable process

2024-11-05 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 05:55:28PM +0300, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: > On Tue, 29. Oct 18:12, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: > > On Tue, 29. Oct 10:20, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 04:31:40PM +0300, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: > > > > BTW, a question to the stable-team: what Git magic (3-way-merge?

Re: [PATCH 0/1] On DRM -> stable process

2024-11-05 Thread Fedor Pchelkin
On Tue, 29. Oct 18:12, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: > On Tue, 29. Oct 10:20, Sasha Levin wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 04:31:40PM +0300, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: > > > BTW, a question to the stable-team: what Git magic (3-way-merge?) let the > > > duplicate patch be applied successfully? The patch conte

Re: [PATCH 0/1] On DRM -> stable process

2024-11-04 Thread Alex Deucher
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 9:55 AM Fedor Pchelkin wrote: > > On Tue, 29. Oct 18:12, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: > > On Tue, 29. Oct 10:20, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 04:31:40PM +0300, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: > > > > BTW, a question to the stable-team: what Git magic (3-way-merge?) let >

Re: [PATCH 0/1] On DRM -> stable process

2024-10-29 Thread Fedor Pchelkin
On Tue, 29. Oct 10:20, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 04:31:40PM +0300, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: > > BTW, a question to the stable-team: what Git magic (3-way-merge?) let the > > duplicate patch be applied successfully? The patch context in stable trees > > was different to that moment s

[PATCH 0/1] On DRM -> stable process

2024-10-29 Thread Fedor Pchelkin
Hi all, I'm writing as a bystander working with 6.1.y stable branch and possibly lacking some context with the established DRM -> stable patch flow, Cc'ing a large number of people. The commit being reverted from 6.1.y is the one that duplicates the changes already backported to that branch with

Re: [PATCH 0/1] On DRM -> stable process

2024-10-29 Thread Sasha Levin
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 04:31:40PM +0300, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: BTW, a question to the stable-team: what Git magic (3-way-merge?) let the duplicate patch be applied successfully? The patch context in stable trees was different to that moment so should the duplicate have been expected to fail to b