work with new version KMS/kmd?
With above question addressed, we can together discuss how to modify
CONTEXT_CONTROL patch
BR Monk
-Original Message-
From: Koenig, Christian
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2016 7:57 PM
To: Liu, Monk
Cc: brahma_hybrid_dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu:im
--Original Message-
From: Christian König [mailto:deathsim...@vodafone.de]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 5:39 PM
To: Liu, Monk ; Koenig, Christian ;
Bas Nieuwenhuizen
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu:implement CONTEXT_CONTROL (v3)
> 1) Is that my patch
essed, we can together discuss how to modify
CONTEXT_CONTROL patch
BR Monk
-Original Message-
From: Koenig, Christian
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2016 7:57 PM
To: Liu, Monk
Cc: brahma_hybrid_dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu:implement CONTEXT_CONTROL (v3)
Another possible solution which
ONTEXT_CONTROL patch
BR Monk
-Original Message-
From: Koenig, Christian
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2016 7:57 PM
To: Liu, Monk
Cc: brahma_hybrid_dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu:implement CONTEXT_CONTROL (v3)
Another possible solution which just came to my mind: Completely ignore
wenhuizen [mailto:b...@basnieuwenhuizen.nl]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 12:09 AM
To: Liu, Monk
Cc: Christian König ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu:implement CONTEXT_CONTROL (v3)
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Liu, Monk wrote:
Why does that makes a differen
uizen.nl]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 12:09 AM
To: Liu, Monk
Cc: Christian König ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu:implement CONTEXT_CONTROL (v3)
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Liu, Monk wrote:
>> Why does that makes a difference if it is seen for the first time?
>&
sktop.org] On Behalf Of
Christian K?nig
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 10:10 PM
To: Liu, Monk ; Bas Nieuwenhuizen
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu:implement CONTEXT_CONTROL (v3)
Am 01.09.2016 um 12:55 schrieb Liu, Monk:
>> Why does that makes a difference
ot correct.
>>> Besides, CONTEXT_CONTROL not only deals CE but also deal DE.
>>
>>
>>> BR Monk
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Bas Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:b...@basnieuwenhuizen.nl]
>>> Sent: Thursday, S
Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:b...@basnieuwenhuizen.nl]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 4:19 PM
To: Liu, Monk
Cc: Christian König ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu:implement CONTEXT_CONTROL (v3)
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Liu, Monk wrote:
-Original Message
s not correct.
> Besides, CONTEXT_CONTROL not only deals CE but also deal DE.
>
> BR Monk
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bas Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:b...@basnieuwenhuizen.nl]
> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 4:19 PM
> To: Liu, Monk
> Cc: Christian König ; amd-g
rg] On Behalf Of
Christian K?nig
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 10:10 PM
To: Liu, Monk ; Bas Nieuwenhuizen
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu:implement CONTEXT_CONTROL (v3)
Am 01.09.2016 um 12:55 schrieb Liu, Monk:
>> Why does that makes a difference if it
sday, September 01, 2016 10:10 PM
To: Liu, Monk ; Bas Nieuwenhuizen
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu:implement CONTEXT_CONTROL (v3)
Am 01.09.2016 um 12:55 schrieb Liu, Monk:
>> Why does that makes a difference if it is seen for the first time?
>>
>>
Monk
Cc: Christian König ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu:implement CONTEXT_CONTROL (v3)
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Liu, Monk wrote:
-Original Message-
From: amd-gfx [mailto:amd-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
Of Christian K?nig
Sent: Wednes
so deal DE.
BR Monk
-Original Message-
From: Bas Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:b...@basnieuwenhuizen.nl]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 4:19 PM
To: Liu, Monk
Cc: Christian König ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu:implement CONTEXT_CONTROL (v3)
On T
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu:implement CONTEXT_CONTROL (v3)
>
> Looks good to me in general, a few nit picks and sugegstions below.
>
> Am 31.08.2016 um 05:49 schrieb Monk Liu:
>> v1:
>> for gfx8, use CONTEXT_CONTROL package to dynamically skip preamble
>> CEIB and ot
v1:
for gfx8, use CONTEXT_CONTROL package to dynamically
skip preamble CEIB and other load_xxx command in sequence.
v2:
support GFX7 as well, and bump up version.
remove cntxcntl in compute ring funcs because CPC doesn't
support this packet.
v3: fix reduntant judgement in cntxcntl.
v4: some clean
-Original Message-
From: amd-gfx [mailto:amd-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
Christian K?nig
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 7:53 PM
To: Liu, Monk ; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu:implement CONTEXT_CONTROL (v3)
Looks good to me in general
Looks good to me in general, a few nit picks and sugegstions below.
Am 31.08.2016 um 05:49 schrieb Monk Liu:
v1:
for gfx8, use CONTEXT_CONTROL package to dynamically
skip preamble CEIB and other load_xxx command in sequence.
v2:
support GFX7 as well, and bump up version.
remove cntxcntl in comp
Monk
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu:implement CONTEXT_CONTROL (v3)
v1:
for gfx8, use CONTEXT_CONTROL package to dynamically skip preamble CEIB and
other load_xxx command in sequence.
v2:
support GFX7 as well, and bump up version.
remove cntxcntl in compute ring funcs because CPC doesn't su
v1:
for gfx8, use CONTEXT_CONTROL package to dynamically
skip preamble CEIB and other load_xxx command in sequence.
v2:
support GFX7 as well, and bump up version.
remove cntxcntl in compute ring funcs because CPC doesn't
support this packet.
v3: fix reduntant judgement in cntxcntl.
Change-Id: I4
20 matches
Mail list logo
