Am 07.11.23 um 16:14 schrieb Alex Deucher:
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 9:52 AM Christian König
wrote:
This is only needed for certain UVD/VCE hardware/firmware versions.
We currently enable it for all UVD and VCE versions.
Leo needs to decide that, but I would rather like to keep the call to
crea
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 2:47 PM Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 10:14 AM Alex Deucher wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 9:52 AM Christian König
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > This is only needed for certain UVD/VCE hardware/firmware versions.
> >
> > We currently enable it for all UVD
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 10:14 AM Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 9:52 AM Christian König
> wrote:
> >
> > This is only needed for certain UVD/VCE hardware/firmware versions.
>
> We currently enable it for all UVD and VCE versions.
>
> >
> > Leo needs to decide that, but I would rath
On 11/7/23 15:47, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 9:19 AM Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 5:52 AM Christian König
>> wrote:
>>> Am 03.11.23 um 23:10 schrieb Alex Deucher:
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 4:17 PM Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 4:17 PM Lube
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 9:52 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
> This is only needed for certain UVD/VCE hardware/firmware versions.
We currently enable it for all UVD and VCE versions.
>
> Leo needs to decide that, but I would rather like to keep the call to
> create the entity in the HW IP specific f
This is only needed for certain UVD/VCE hardware/firmware versions.
Leo needs to decide that, but I would rather like to keep the call to
create the entity in the HW IP specific files.
Regards,
Christian.
Am 07.11.23 um 15:47 schrieb Alex Deucher:
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 9:19 AM Alex Deucher
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 9:19 AM Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 5:52 AM Christian König
> wrote:
> >
> > Am 03.11.23 um 23:10 schrieb Alex Deucher:
> > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 4:17 PM Alex Deucher wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 4:17 PM Luben Tuikov wrote:
> > >>> Pushed to
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 5:52 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 03.11.23 um 23:10 schrieb Alex Deucher:
> > On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 4:17 PM Alex Deucher wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 4:17 PM Luben Tuikov wrote:
> >>> Pushed to drm-misc-next.
> >> BTW, I'm seeing the following on older GPUs wit
Am 03.11.23 um 23:10 schrieb Alex Deucher:
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 4:17 PM Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 4:17 PM Luben Tuikov wrote:
Pushed to drm-misc-next.
BTW, I'm seeing the following on older GPUs with VCE and UVD even with
this patch:
[ 11.886024] amdgpu :0a:00.0: [d
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 4:17 PM Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 4:17 PM Luben Tuikov wrote:
> >
> > Pushed to drm-misc-next.
>
> BTW, I'm seeing the following on older GPUs with VCE and UVD even with
> this patch:
> [ 11.886024] amdgpu :0a:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* drm_sched_job_in
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 4:17 PM Luben Tuikov wrote:
>
> Pushed to drm-misc-next.
BTW, I'm seeing the following on older GPUs with VCE and UVD even with
this patch:
[ 11.886024] amdgpu :0a:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* drm_sched_job_init:
entity has no rq!
[ 11.886028] amdgpu :0a:00.0: [drm:amdg
Thanks!
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 4:17 PM Luben Tuikov wrote:
>
> Pushed to drm-misc-next.
>
> Regards,
> Luben
>
> On 2023-10-26 15:52, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> > On 2023-10-26 15:32, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 2:22 AM Christian König
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Am 25.10.23 um 19:1
Pushed to drm-misc-next.
Regards,
Luben
On 2023-10-26 15:52, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> On 2023-10-26 15:32, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 2:22 AM Christian König
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 25.10.23 um 19:19 schrieb Alex Deucher:
Rather than doing this in the IP code for the SDMA pagi
On 2023-10-26 15:32, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 2:22 AM Christian König
> wrote:
>>
>> Am 25.10.23 um 19:19 schrieb Alex Deucher:
>>> Rather than doing this in the IP code for the SDMA paging
>>> engine, move it up to the core device level init level.
>>> This should fix the sch
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 2:22 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 25.10.23 um 19:19 schrieb Alex Deucher:
> > Rather than doing this in the IP code for the SDMA paging
> > engine, move it up to the core device level init level.
> > This should fix the scheduler init ordering.
> >
> > v2: drop extra pa
Am 25.10.23 um 19:19 schrieb Alex Deucher:
Rather than doing this in the IP code for the SDMA paging
engine, move it up to the core device level init level.
This should fix the scheduler init ordering.
v2: drop extra parens
v3: drop SDMA helpers
Tested-by: Luben Tuikov
Signed-off-by: Alex Deuc
Rather than doing this in the IP code for the SDMA paging
engine, move it up to the core device level init level.
This should fix the scheduler init ordering.
v2: drop extra parens
v3: drop SDMA helpers
Tested-by: Luben Tuikov
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_d
Rather than doing this in the IP code for the SDMA paging
engine, move it up to the core device level init level.
This should fix the scheduler init ordering.
v2: drop extra parens
Tested-by: Luben Tuikov
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 12 +
Am 25.10.23 um 06:24 schrieb Luben Tuikov:
From: Alex Deucher
Rather than doing this in the IP code for the SDMA paging
engine, move it up to the core device level init level.
This should fix the scheduler init ordering.
v2: Fix checkpatch parens complaint; long lines. (Luben)
Signed-off-by:
From: Alex Deucher
Rather than doing this in the IP code for the SDMA paging
engine, move it up to the core device level init level.
This should fix the scheduler init ordering.
v2: Fix checkpatch parens complaint; long lines. (Luben)
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher
Tested-by: Luben Tuikov
---
d
20 matches
Mail list logo
