On 3/28/2025 8:28 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 9:50 AM Christian König
wrote:
Am 27.03.25 um 10:37 schrieb SRINIVASAN SHANMUGAM:
On 3/27/2025 2:54 PM, Christian König wrote:
Over all this change doesn't seem to make much sense to me.
Why exactly is isolation->spearhead n
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 9:50 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 27.03.25 um 10:37 schrieb SRINIVASAN SHANMUGAM:
>
> On 3/27/2025 2:54 PM, Christian König wrote:
>
> Over all this change doesn't seem to make much sense to me.
>
> Why exactly is isolation->spearhead not pointing to the dummy kernel jo
Am 27.03.25 um 10:37 schrieb SRINIVASAN SHANMUGAM:
> On 3/27/2025 2:54 PM, Christian König wrote:
> Over all this change doesn't seem to make much sense to me.
> Why exactly is isolation->spearhead not pointing to the dummy kernel job
> we submit?
Does the owner check or gang_subm
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 5:37 AM SRINIVASAN SHANMUGAM
wrote:
>
>
> On 3/27/2025 2:54 PM, Christian König wrote:
>
>
> Over all this change doesn't seem to make much sense to me.
>
> Why exactly is isolation->spearhead not pointing to the dummy kernel job we
> submit?
>
> Does the owner check or ga
On 3/27/2025 2:54 PM, Christian König wrote:
Over all this change doesn't seem to make much sense to me.
Why exactly is isolation->spearhead not pointing to the dummy kernel job we
submit?
Does the owner check or gang_submit check in
amdgpu_device_enforce_isolation() fail to set up the spear
>>> Over all this change doesn't seem to make much sense to me.
>>> Why exactly is isolation->spearhead not pointing to the dummy kernel job we
>>> submit?
>> Does the owner check or gang_submit check in
>> amdgpu_device_enforce_isolation() fail to set up the spearhead?
> I'm currently debugging
Am 26.03.25 um 14:55 schrieb Alex Deucher:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 4:13 AM Christian König
> wrote:
>> Am 25.03.25 um 16:24 schrieb Srinivasan Shanmugam:
>>> This commit addresses the issue where the cleaner shader was not
>>> correctly executed during gang submissions due to improper handling o
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 4:13 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 25.03.25 um 16:24 schrieb Srinivasan Shanmugam:
> > This commit addresses the issue where the cleaner shader was not
> > correctly executed during gang submissions due to improper handling of
> > the isolation spearhead.
> >
> > - Enhan
Am 25.03.25 um 16:24 schrieb Srinivasan Shanmugam:
> This commit addresses the issue where the cleaner shader was not
> correctly executed during gang submissions due to improper handling of
> the isolation spearhead.
>
> - Enhanced the `amdgpu_gfx_run_cleaner_shader_job` function to
> initialize
This commit addresses the issue where the cleaner shader was not
correctly executed during gang submissions due to improper handling of
the isolation spearhead.
- Enhanced the `amdgpu_gfx_run_cleaner_shader_job` function to
initialize `isolation->spearhead` with the job's scheduled fence for
c
10 matches
Mail list logo