On 2018-11-29 10:44 a.m., Nicholas Kazlauskas wrote:
> [Why]
> If the "max bpc" isn't explicitly set in the atomic state then it
> have a value of 0. This has the correct behavior of limiting a panel
> to 8bpc in the case where the panel supports 8bpc. In the case of eDP
> panels this isn't a true
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher
From: amd-gfx on behalf of Nicholas
Kazlauskas
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 10:44:46 AM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Kazlauskas, Nicholas
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix unintialized max_bpc state values
[Why]
If
[Why]
If the "max bpc" isn't explicitly set in the atomic state then it
have a value of 0. This has the correct behavior of limiting a panel
to 8bpc in the case where the panel supports 8bpc. In the case of eDP
panels this isn't a true assumption - there are panels that can only
do 6bpc.
Banding o
