Since the problem with enabling FTRACE_MCOUNT_MAX_OFFSET may be
test_for_valid_rec() returning wrong results, I made a small patch to
catch the result:
patch-test_for_valid_rec-printk.patch
diff -up ./kernel/trace/ftrace.c.ft ./kernel/trace/ftrace.c
--- ./kernel/trace/ftrace.c.ft
rost...@goodmis.org sed in <20230717112138.1fd48...@gandalf.local.home>
>> On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 11:39:11 +0900
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > Yes, this is puzzling. That's why I need other people's opinion on this.
>> > Does it matter the DUT is a slow machine (Pentium 120MHz)?
>> >
>>
>> Hmm, I wonder
rost...@goodmis.org sed in <20230717113623.41878...@gandalf.local.home>
>> On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 14:34:04 +0900
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Patch in
>> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217669#c4
>> > fixed the problem in freedesktop.org kernel 5.18.0-rc2 .
>> > This may explain that in kernel.o
rost...@goodmis.org sed in <20230714100019.6bf9b...@gandalf.local.home>
>> On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 14:34:04 +0900
>> wrote:
>>
>> > >> > So I'm confused about why it's mentioned. Was it backported?
>> > >>
>> > >> Taketo Kabe, could you please help to clean this confusion up? Did you
>> > >> mean
Thanks you all for getting attention to the report:
regressi...@leemhuis.info sed in
<55a3bbb1-5b3c-f454-b529-8ee9944cc...@leemhuis.info>
>> On 14.07.23 05:12, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 09:50:17 +0700
>> > Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> >
>> >> I notice a regression report on Bu
Thanks you all for getting attention to the report:
regressi...@leemhuis.info sed in
<55a3bbb1-5b3c-f454-b529-8ee9944cc...@leemhuis.info>
>> On 14.07.23 05:12, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 09:50:17 +0700
>> > Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> >
>> >> I notice a regression report on Bu