Reding
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Lefaure
---
This patch was part of a bigger patch [1] reviewed by Thierry Reding
before it was split in several patches.
[1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9979843/
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 9 +
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 9
On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 15:22:24 -0400
bfie...@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields) wrote:
> Mainly I'd just like to know which you're asking for. Do you want me to
> apply this, or to ACK it so someone else can? If it's sent as a series
> I tend to assume the latter.
>
> But in this case I'm assuming it'
On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 09:01:31 +1100
"Tobin C. Harding" wrote:
> > In order to reduce the size of the To: and Cc: lines, each patch of the
> > series is sent only to the maintainers and lists concerned by the patch.
> > This cover letter is sent to every list concerned by this series.
>
> Why don
;
T[] E;
position p;
@@
(
(sizeof(E)@p /sizeof(*E))
|
(sizeof(E)@p /sizeof(E[...]))
|
(sizeof(E)@p /sizeof(T))
)
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Lefaure
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 9 +
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 9 +
drivers/gpu/drm
Hi everyone,
Using ARRAY_SIZE improves the code readability. I used coccinelle (I
made a change to the array_size.cocci file [1]) to find several places
where ARRAY_SIZE could be used instead of other macros or sizeof
division.
I tried to divide the changes into a patch per subsystem (excepted for
