Re: A proposal to release 2.9

2018-03-05 Thread Mark Kretschmann
Hi, no crash on exit for me with latest master. I'll try to figure this out with Heiko on IRC. Is anyone else here getting this crash? Mark On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Heiko Becker wrote: > Hi, > > On 02/24/18 23:58, Stefano Pettini wrote: > > it looks like there's a general agreement o

Re: A proposal to release 2.9

2018-03-04 Thread Heiko Becker
Hi, On 02/24/18 23:58, Stefano Pettini wrote: > it looks like there's a general agreement on releasing 2.9 from master, > Myriam is also fine with the plan. I said in the past I wanted to do it > but I have no experience and time so if Heiko can do it then I would > prefer this solution. I create

Re: A proposal to release 2.9

2018-02-24 Thread Stefano Pettini
Hi everybody, it looks like there's a general agreement on releasing 2.9 from master, Myriam is also fine with the plan. I said in the past I wanted to do it but I have no experience and time so if Heiko can do it then I would prefer this solution. About KF5 and master, what's the plan? Merging t

Re: A proposal to release 2.9

2018-02-23 Thread andreas k
with oxygen-icons we make a new oxygen-icons5 repository that nothing will be destroyed in kde4. cheers Andreas 2018-02-23 13:45 GMT+01:00 Mark Kretschmann : > Hello Heiko, > > this sounds like a good proposal. I can also provide some help as I've > done releases in the past. > > About merging K

Re: A proposal to release 2.9

2018-02-23 Thread Mark Kretschmann
Hello Heiko, this sounds like a good proposal. I can also provide some help as I've done releases in the past. About merging KF5 branch into master, I'm not sure how feasible this is considering that both branches have diverged a lot. Perhaps we will need to ask the admins to switch (or rather re

Re: A proposal to release 2.9

2018-02-22 Thread Heiko Becker
Hello everybody, On 01/26/18 13:45, Matěj Laitl wrote: > Hi Stefano, > I totally agree, 2.9 should be released to push the work done to users. I agree, although I don't really know how adoption by distros will turn out, considering Qt4 is EOL since quite some time, same for KDELibs (although not

Re: A proposal to release 2.9

2018-01-26 Thread Matěj Laitl
Hi Stefano, I totally agree, 2.9 should be released to push the work done to users. I unfortunately won't find time to do it myself, but: try to start making the release yourself! ;) It should be documented quite well. If you get stuck or need help with particular tasks, speak up on ML (and CC me

Re: A proposal to release 2.9

2018-01-11 Thread Michał Zając
Hi, Long time user here. I concur, releasing 2.9 would be a good move and we might actually use it as an opportunity to get more people working on Amarok. My C++ is crap but I'm willing to help out with the simple things. Here's something to spark a discussion on where Amarok should head to: I d