On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Leo Franchi wrote:
> On May 27, 2012, at 10:13 PM, Ryan Feng wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The Spotify service plugin has two parts, a standalone Spotify resolver and
> a Amarok side Script Resolver, it's mainly from Tomahawk. I've rewrote the
> Amarok side resolver, it can
On May 27, 2012, at 10:13 PM, Ryan Feng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Spotify service plugin has two parts, a standalone Spotify resolver and
> a Amarok side Script Resolver, it's mainly from Tomahawk. I've rewrote the
> Amarok side resolver, it can work without Tomahawk base classes and headers
> now.
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Ryan Feng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Spotify service plugin has two parts, a standalone Spotify resolver and
> a Amarok side Script Resolver, it's mainly from Tomahawk. I've rewrote the
> Amarok side resolver, it can work without Tomahawk base classes and headers
> now
Hi,
The Spotify service plugin has two parts, a standalone Spotify resolver and
a Amarok side Script Resolver, it's mainly from Tomahawk. I've rewrote the
Amarok side resolver, it can work without Tomahawk base classes and headers
now. Here[1] is the code.
In the following week, I will continue