On 30 Oct 2014 20:30, "vedant agarwala" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Nitul Datt wrote:
>>
>> Hey!
>>
>> On 10/30/14, vedant agarwala wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Nitul Datt
wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hey!
>> >>
>> >> On 10/29/14, vedant agarwala wrote:
>> >> > Then do
Sorry forgot to cc amarok-devel
-- Forwarded message --
From: vedant agarwala
Date: Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: Draft SoK Proposal
To: Nitul Datt
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Nitul Datt wrote:
> Hey!
>
> On 10/30/14, vedant agarwala wrote:
&
Hey!
On 10/30/14, vedant agarwala wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Nitul Datt wrote:
>
>> Hey!
>>
>> On 10/29/14, vedant agarwala wrote:
>> > Then do that.
>> >
>> > When you post a draft proposal on the mailing list post the entire text
>> as
>> > plain text rather than a link to a do
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Nitul Datt wrote:
> Hey!
>
> On 10/29/14, vedant agarwala wrote:
> > Then do that.
> >
> > When you post a draft proposal on the mailing list post the entire text
> as
> > plain text rather than a link to a doc. Easier to read and comment in
> line.
>
> This is a
Hey!
On 10/29/14, vedant agarwala wrote:
> Then do that.
>
> When you post a draft proposal on the mailing list post the entire text as
> plain text rather than a link to a doc. Easier to read and comment in line.
This is a draft of my proposal to implement cue sheet support in
Amarok. Suggestio
Then do that.
When you post a draft proposal on the mailing list post the entire text as
plain text rather than a link to a doc. Easier to read and comment in line.
Regards,
Vedant.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Nitul Datt wrote:
>
> On 29 Oct 2014 13:06, "vedant agarwala" wrote:
> >
> >
>
On 29 Oct 2014 13:06, "vedant agarwala" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Nitul Datt wrote:
>>
>> Hey!
>>
>> On 10/28/14, vedant agarwala wrote:
>> > Hello Nitul,
>> >
>> > Seems like you forgot to "reply to all" (as amarok-devel was not in
your
>> > recipients).
>> >
>> > On Tue,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Nitul Datt wrote:
> Hey!
>
> On 10/28/14, vedant agarwala wrote:
> > Hello Nitul,
> >
> > Seems like you forgot to "reply to all" (as amarok-devel was not in your
> > recipients).
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Nitul Datt
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/27/14
Hey!
On 10/28/14, vedant agarwala wrote:
> Hello Nitul,
>
> Seems like you forgot to "reply to all" (as amarok-devel was not in your
> recipients).
>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Nitul Datt wrote:
>
>> On 10/27/14, vedant agarwala wrote:
>> > Hello Nitul,
>> >
>> > I agree with all that
Hello Nitul,
Seems like you forgot to "reply to all" (as amarok-devel was not in your
recipients).
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Nitul Datt wrote:
> On 10/27/14, vedant agarwala wrote:
> > Hello Nitul,
> >
> > I agree with all that Myriam has said. I should've waited for a go-ahead
> > for
Hello Nitul,
I agree with all that Myriam has said. I should've waited for a go-ahead
for a senior Amarok member; if you remember I had mentioned that I was
unable to get in touch with them. Sorry for rushing in and making you do
some extra work.
Take your time and pick a new project from the 2 m
Hi Nitul,
Thanks for your proposal, but I have some doubts about this.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Nitul Datt wrote:
> Hi!
One thing which springs to mind is, suppose a user
> wants to store a custom cover. Should that also be stored in the
> filesystem mentioned in the specification or sho
Hi!
Please have a look at the first draft of my proposal for SoK [1]. I'd
like your comments and pointers on how it con be improved, especially
the timeline. I'd also like to know if I've missed anything from the
technical aspect. One thing which springs to mind is, suppose a user
wants to store a
13 matches
Mail list logo
