Re: [Port KF5] Why we get so many segfault...

2015-10-22 Thread Olivier Churlaud
Hi, once again I was wrong. The issue is triggered according to what you comment in the listForLevel() function (the one I was talking about sooner)... But what exactly and why? I'm still searching... Olivier Le 22/10/2015 20:03, Olivier Churlaud a écrit : Hi, Le 22/10/2015 18:22, Aditya S

Re: [Port KF5] Why we get so many segfault...

2015-10-22 Thread Olivier Churlaud
Hi, Le 22/10/2015 18:22, Aditya Sharma a écrit : Hello, Sorry for not being able to get back to you on IRC. I have been busy with another project of mine at my university for quite some time now. If a method was virtual before and is pure virtual now then one can't cal

Re: [Port KF5] Why we get so many segfault...

2015-10-22 Thread Aditya Sharma
> Hello, > > Sorry for not being able to get back to you on IRC. I have been busy with > another project of mine at my university for quite some time now. > > If a method was virtual before and is pure virtual now then one can't call > that function as the method is of an abstract class now in Qt5

Re: [Port KF5] Why we get so many segfault...

2015-10-22 Thread Aroonav Mishra
Hello, Sorry for not being able to get back to you on IRC. I have been busy with another project of mine at my university for quite some time now. If a method was virtual before and is pure virtual now then one can't call that function as the method is of an abstract class now in Qt5 (and hence c

[Port KF5] Why we get so many segfault...

2015-10-20 Thread Olivier Churlaud
Hi, I found why we get so many nasty segfault... Several methods of Qt4 (which were virtual) are now (with Qt5) pure virtual, meaning that they are defined like: virtual void myfunction( ...args...) = 0 ; Therefore calling them produces a segfault... IMO, we should first comment them