On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Bill Unruh wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > thanks for answering
> > >
> > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Park Hays wrote:
> > >
> > > > Touch difficult to say with the relative lack of detail, but I
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Bill Unruh wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > thanks for answering
> >
> > On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Park Hays wrote:
> >
> > > Touch difficult to say with the relative lack of detail, but I have a
> > > couple thoughts.
> > >
> > > First, you should in
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> thanks for answering
>
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Park Hays wrote:
>
> > Touch difficult to say with the relative lack of detail, but I have a
> > couple thoughts.
> >
> > First, you should include the method you are using to record, so that we
> > can
thanks for answering
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Park Hays wrote:
> Touch difficult to say with the relative lack of detail, but I have a
> couple thoughts.
>
> First, you should include the method you are using to record, so that we
> can see more detail.
tried rec and arecord, basically like
$ rec t
Touch difficult to say with the relative lack of detail, but I have a
couple thoughts.
First, you should include the method you are using to record, so that we
can see more detail.
My first guess, if you hear a kind of white-noise hiss, is that you have
a byte order problem. lame uses, I believe
