Stephen Mollett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday 23 Nov 2002 22:25, Bob Lockie wrote:
> > Why do people even try the v5 version?
> > The official homepage seems clear.
>
> I guess they see the bit that says 'Stable release' next to the 0.5 series and
> 'Development release' nex
Hi,
On Saturday 23 Nov 2002 22:25, Bob Lockie wrote:
> Why do people even try the v5 version?
> The official homepage seems clear.
I guess they see the bit that says 'Stable release' next to the 0.5 series and
'Development release' next to 0.9 and think, "Oooh, I'd better go for the
stable one,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many thanks to everybody for the help and interest.
Bob Lockie writes:
Why do people even try the v5 version?
This is not the first person.
The answer is disarmingly simple: The ALSA home page 'alsa-project.org'
itself:
N.B. The 0.5.x series is considered de
Completely remove old modules in this directory bytypingrm -rf /lib/modules/(your kernel version)/misc> Compile the driver with these options.> --with-kernel=(your kernel source dir path)--with-moddir=/lib/modules/(your kernel version)/misc> --with-cards=(youur sound card chipset name)type ./config
Hi,
On Saturday 23 Nov 2002 06:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> After I upgraded the kernel to 2.4.19, the system works OK and I decided to
> install ANSA Driver 0.5.12a, Lib 0.5.10b, Utils 0.5.10. The installation
> went OK as well. The set up I'm using is for snd-ens1371.
> ... Any ideas?.
Have
Have you tried alsa 0.9.0rc6? alsa 0.5.x is officially 'obsolete' so it may
not work properly with the latest kernels as it's not being maintained any
more.
Why do people even try the v5 version?
This is not the first person.
Where are the old versions coming from?
The official homepage seem
