Re: [Alsa-user] snd_serial_u16550 and serial addon cards

2017-02-15 Thread Ede Wolf
Am 15.02.2017 um 22:43 schrieb Ede Wolf: > >> It's not the protocol. But when these drivers were written, the kernel >> had no way to access the serial/parallel ports in a way that would be >> most useful for the driver, so it just acesses the hardware directly. Thanks for explanation! To the g

Re: [Alsa-user] snd_serial_u16550 and serial addon cards

2017-02-15 Thread Clemens Ladisch
Ede Wolf wrote: > Thanks, I suppose this holds true for the mtpav driver, too? Yes. > It is a bit surprising, that the protocol is bus dependent It's not the protocol. But when these drivers were written, the kernel had no way to access the serial/parallel ports in a way that would be most usef

Re: [Alsa-user] snd_serial_u16550 and serial addon cards

2017-02-14 Thread Ede Wolf
Thanks, I suppose this holds true for the mtpav driver, too? It is a bit surprising, that the protocol is bus dependent, but thanks for the heads up Ede Am 11.02.2017 um 23:20 schrieb Clemens Ladisch: > Ede Wolf wrote: >> I am having troubles getting a Emagic Unitor working with either a PCI >

Re: [Alsa-user] snd_serial_u16550 and serial addon cards

2017-02-11 Thread Clemens Ladisch
Ede Wolf wrote: > I am having troubles getting a Emagic Unitor working with either a PCI > or a PCIe serial addon card. The driver was written for ISA COM ports. Regards, Clemens -- Check out the vibrant tech community

[Alsa-user] snd_serial_u16550 and serial addon cards

2017-02-11 Thread Ede Wolf
Hello, I am having troubles getting a Emagic Unitor working with either a PCI or a PCIe serial addon card. Works fine with the onboard serial port, though. However, since I cannot pass thru the onboard serial port to a guest to configure the device, I'd like to use an addon card. Also, in futu