Re: [Alsa-user] question about upgrading to 1.0.0pre* vs other sound software

2003-11-23 Thread wwp
Hi Jaroslav Kysela, On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 12:32:38 +0100 (CET) Jaroslav Kysela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, wwp wrote: > > > is it necessary to recompiled sound-related stuff like esound, or xmms > > when upgrading to ALSA 1.0.0pre? Or does 1.0.0 breaks 0.9.0 library/headers

Re: [Alsa-user] question about upgrading to 1.0.0pre* vs other sound software

2003-11-23 Thread Jaroslav Kysela
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, wwp wrote: > Hi! > > > is it necessary to recompiled sound-related stuff like esound, or xmms > when upgrading to ALSA 1.0.0pre? Or does 1.0.0 breaks 0.9.0 library/headers > compat? The binary compatibility is kept (so if you have compiled binaries against old library, they

[Alsa-user] question about upgrading to 1.0.0pre* vs other sound software

2003-11-23 Thread wwp
Hi! is it necessary to recompiled sound-related stuff like esound, or xmms when upgrading to ALSA 1.0.0pre? Or does 1.0.0 breaks 0.9.0 library/headers compat? Regards, -- wwp --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.